From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:06:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402151404.0CAF526@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213154416.422739-4-kuba@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:44:15AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> [...]
> +/**
> + * XFAIL()
> + *
> + * @statement: statement to run after reporting XFAIL
> + * @fmt: format string
> + * @...: optional arguments
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
> + * XFAIL(statement, fmt, ...);
> + *
> + * This forces a "pass" after reporting why something is expected to fail,
> + * and runs "statement", which is usually "return" or "goto skip".
> + */
> +#define XFAIL(statement, fmt, ...) do { \
> + snprintf(_metadata->results->reason, \
> + sizeof(_metadata->results->reason), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + if (TH_LOG_ENABLED) { \
> + fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# XFAIL %s\n", \
Oh! I just noticed this while testing changes to use XFAIL, there is an
alignment issue: one too many spaces after "XFAIL" above, which leads
to misaligned output.
fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# XFAIL %s\n", \
fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# SKIP %s\n", \
Compare the position of "%s" above...
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 15:44 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: pass step via shared memory Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-19 2:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: use KSFT_* exit codes Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:55 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-14 19:40 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-14 21:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-15 0:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-15 0:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-15 22:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-15 22:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Kees Cook
2024-02-14 10:09 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402151404.0CAF526@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).