From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: <alexander@mihalicyn.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<dhowells@redhat.com>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
<leitao@debian.org>, <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:00:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240217010017.88921-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216232220.it.450-kees@kernel.org>
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:22:23 -0800
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
>
> Avoid the following false positive warning with future changes to
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 3068) of destination "&nsk->__sk_common.skc_dontcopy_end" at net/core/sock.c:2057 (size 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>
> v2- add inet_reqsk_clone() instance too
> v1- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240216204423.work.066-kees@kernel.org/
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 5 +++--
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 0a7f46c37f0c..b7ea358eb18f 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2053,8 +2053,9 @@ static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)
>
> memcpy(nsk, osk, offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
>
> - memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> - prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
> + unsafe_memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> + prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
> + /* alloc is larger than struct, see sk_prot_alloc() */);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
> nsk->sk_security = sptr;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 459af1f89739..4a1d96ba3ad1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -906,8 +906,9 @@ static struct request_sock *inet_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req,
>
> memcpy(nreq_sk, req_sk,
> offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
> - memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> - req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
> + unsafe_memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> + req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
> + /* alloc is larger than struct, see sk_prot_alloc() */);
nit: reqsk is allocated in inet_reqsk_clone().
>
> sk_node_init(&nreq_sk->sk_node);
> nreq_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping = req_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-17 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 23:22 [PATCH v2] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy() Kees Cook
2024-02-17 1:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240217010017.88921-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).