From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, kuniyu@amazon.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv6
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:28:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219032838.91723-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219032838.91723-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Like previous patch does, only moving skb drop logical code to
cookie_v6_check() for later refinement.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
--
v6
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c987d2c79e4a4655166eb8eafef473384edb37fb.camel@redhat.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL+tcoAgSjwsmFnDh_Gs9ZgMi-y5awtVx+4VhJPNRADjo7LLSA@mail.gmail.com/
1. take one case into consideration, behave like old days, or else it will trigger errors.
v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKz7=1q7e8KY57Dn3ED7O=RCOfLxoHQKO4eNXnZa1OPWg@mail.gmail.com/
1. avoid duplication of these opt_skb tests/actions (Eric)
---
net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
index 6b9c69278819..ea0d9954a29f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct sock *ret = sk;
__u8 rcv_wscale;
int full_space;
+ SKB_DR(reason);
if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies) ||
!th->ack || th->rst)
@@ -256,10 +257,13 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst);
ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto out_drop;
out:
return ret;
out_free:
reqsk_free(req);
out_drop:
+ kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 57b25b1fc9d9..4cfeedfb871f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1653,12 +1653,11 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb);
- if (!nsk)
- goto discard;
-
- if (nsk != sk) {
+ if (nsk && nsk != sk) {
if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb))
goto reset;
+ }
+ if (!nsk || nsk != sk) {
if (opt_skb)
__kfree_skb(opt_skb);
return 0;
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 3:28 [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] tcp: add a dropreason definitions and prepare for cookie check Jason Xing
2024-02-19 4:06 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-19 4:56 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/11] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv4 Jason Xing
2024-02-19 4:13 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/11] tcp: use drop reasons " Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-02-19 4:38 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv6 Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-19 4:57 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] tcp: use drop reasons " Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] tcp: introduce dropreasons in receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-19 4:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-19 4:57 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/11] tcp: add more specific possible drop reasons in tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-19 4:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-19 5:07 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/11] tcp: add dropreasons in tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/11] tcp: make the dropreason really work when calling tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/11] tcp: make dropreason in tcp_child_process() work Jason Xing
2024-02-19 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] tcp: get rid of NOT_SPECIFIED reason in tcp_v4/6_do_rcv Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240219032838.91723-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).