netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for bridge port isolation
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:53:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221175357.GE722610@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221093429.802077-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:34:29AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Implement bridge port isolation for KSZ switches. Enabling the isolation
> of switch ports from each other while maintaining connectivity with the
> CPU and other forwarding ports. For instance, to isolate swp1 and swp2
> from each other, use the following commands:
> - bridge link set dev swp1 isolated on
> - bridge link set dev swp2 isolated on
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
> ---
> changes v2:
> - add comments and new lines
> 
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index 7cd37133ec05..efe54c9492e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -1898,6 +1898,29 @@ static void ksz_get_strings(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * ksz_adjust_port_member - Adjust port forwarding rules based on STP state and
> + *			    isolation settings.
> + * @dev: A pointer to the struct ksz_device representing the device.
> + * @port: The port number to adjust.
> +
> + * This function dynamically adjusts the port membership configuration for a
> + * specified port and other device ports, based on Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
> + * states and port isolation settings. Each port, including the CPU port, has a
> + * membership register, represented as a bitfield, where each bit corresponds
> + * to a port number. A set bit indicates permission to forward frames to that
> + * port. This function iterates over all ports, updating the membership register
> + * to reflect current forwarding permissions:
> + *
> + * 1. Forwards frames only to ports that are part of the same bridge group and
> + *    in the BR_STATE_FORWARDING state.
> + * 2. Takes into account the isolation status of ports; ports in the
> + *    BR_STATE_FORWARDING state with BR_ISOLATED configuration will not forward
> + *    frames to each other, even if they are in the same bridge group.
> + * 3. Ensures that the CPU port is included in the membership based on its
> + *    upstream port configuration, allowing for management and control traffic
> + *    to flow as required.
> + */
>  static void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)

...

Hi Oleksij,

I haven't looked over this patch closely.
But it does seem to have some Kernel doc problems.

  .../ksz_common.c:1905: warning: bad line:
  .../ksz_common.c:1924: warning: expecting prototype for ksz_adjust_port_member(). Prototype was for ksz_update_port_member() instead

You can observe these by running ./scripts/kernel-doc -none

I'm going to flag this as Changes Requested in patchwork
as typically this kind of problem gets flagged by bots sooner or later.

pw-bot: changes-requested


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21  9:34 [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for bridge port isolation Oleksij Rempel
2024-02-21 17:53 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-02-22  7:33   ` Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221175357.GE722610@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).