From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 10/10] tcp: make dropreason in tcp_child_process() work
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:47:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223194756.7942-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223102851.83749-11-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:28:51 +0800
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
>
> It's time to let it work right now. We've already prepared for this:)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
> --
> v9
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c5640fc4-16dc-4058-97c6-bd84bae4fda1@kernel.org/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKE2vYz_6sYd=u3HbqdgiU0BWhdMY9-ivs0Rcht+X+Rfg@mail.gmail.com/
> 1. add reviewed-by tag (David)
> 2. add reviewed-by tag (Eric)
>
> v8
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89i+huvL_Zidru_sNHbjwgM7==-q49+mgJq7vZPRgH6DgKg@mail.gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKmaZZSnk5+CCtSH43jeUgRWNQPV4cjc0vpWNT7nHnQQg@mail.gmail.com/
> 1. squash v7 patch [11/11] into the current patch.
> 2. refine the rcv codes. (Eric)
>
> v7
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240219043815.98410-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> 1. adjust the related part of code only since patch [04/11] is changed.
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 12 +++++++-----
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index c79e25549972..a22ee5838751 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1907,7 +1907,6 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> if (tcp_checksum_complete(skb))
> goto csum_err;
>
> @@ -1917,7 +1916,8 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!nsk)
> return 0;
> if (nsk != sk) {
> - if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
> + reason = tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb);
> + if (reason) {
> rsk = nsk;
> goto reset;
> }
> @@ -2276,10 +2276,12 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (nsk == sk) {
> reqsk_put(req);
> tcp_v4_restore_cb(skb);
> - } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
> - tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb);
> - goto discard_and_relse;
> } else {
> + drop_reason = tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb);
> + if (drop_reason) {
> + tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb);
> + goto discard_and_relse;
> + }
> sock_put(sk);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> index 4f8464e04b7f..f677f0fa5196 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> @@ -1623,7 +1623,6 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (np->rxopt.all)
> opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
>
> - reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) { /* Fast path */
> struct dst_entry *dst;
>
> @@ -1654,8 +1653,11 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb);
>
> if (nsk != sk) {
> - if (nsk && tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb))
> - goto reset;
> + if (nsk) {
> + reason = tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb);
> + if (reason)
> + goto reset;
> + }
> if (opt_skb)
> __kfree_skb(opt_skb);
> return 0;
> @@ -1854,10 +1856,12 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (nsk == sk) {
> reqsk_put(req);
> tcp_v6_restore_cb(skb);
> - } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
> - tcp_v6_send_reset(nsk, skb);
> - goto discard_and_relse;
> } else {
> + drop_reason = tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb);
> + if (drop_reason) {
> + tcp_v6_send_reset(nsk, skb);
> + goto discard_and_relse;
> + }
> sock_put(sk);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.37.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 10:28 [PATCH net-next v9 00/10] introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 01/10] tcp: add a dropreason definitions and prepare for cookie check Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:12 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 02/10] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv4 Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 19:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 03/10] tcp: use drop reasons " Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:22 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 04/10] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv6 Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 05/10] tcp: use drop reasons " Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:28 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 06/10] tcp: introduce dropreasons in receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:33 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-24 0:01 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 07/10] tcp: add more specific possible drop reasons in tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:35 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 08/10] tcp: add dropreasons in tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:41 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 09/10] tcp: make the dropreason really work when calling tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-02-23 23:59 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-26 3:04 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-23 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next v9 10/10] tcp: make dropreason in tcp_child_process() work Jason Xing
2024-02-23 19:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223194756.7942-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).