From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B5112AAC5 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708959920; cv=none; b=iO0r/rw5tmiw6epyUYCT/+JQPl8eEbMWvFeEQLwTsVLzJVikfCMJsEjcgJd6SFNzNOKUc547FNkGxGWi34NSoCtF1hJMeqj4D0UPFLELG+Rw4c5ukTuBuusOBhj1IfQ2ZriWezuiKQ34Eca/20zXpLETc0ojiV3W3HvVDMNFIns= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708959920; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zol89mfDklBLMH+nBH3vpuEkihDdjcvIc6aPHvqgIHY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OQ+7twifBHcHQYee/D0P1N5RkKgYYcixgo3uHO6gTteBLKw7+8W43HNa0qZkN7+Lyru2pYd25g/cyH4zHU41aSAlXlc0nEzNZOFyjaSNe1YoB/N4oc3BbTzvKJy+cZmHaszuMcEwvPDMjcSyfgJwXgxJ1sqkYZvtnaLSUwt6/VQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=k/EgvG4/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k/EgvG4/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5772CC433C7; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708959919; bh=Zol89mfDklBLMH+nBH3vpuEkihDdjcvIc6aPHvqgIHY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k/EgvG4/lqQvumb26BHTxy1nXLwUQc/j6hAKhTY0AhN9Z4hWot2lNm5AB+SLhoXY2 kEFNnORa4uxdSLC7jJOqqvHqpR80Y9QmztBTXrTa6PZ+eDAFop3CV4Zq6dykxXLrd7 r27hC5crP/nzsYdE9BW5wfuaUwoFPRAtAxLHj/CtQhRPn33Bh7kqGq2N4aP8p571o/ nIL0aiJzICJdr2Mzp8rtuwIV//q/R1T3wxFFKAwN4BOAE+R18TpdYjXDhx2Aar3yql m63XHdkS2POed6qNjGwIdhPovjF5IlOKLIFxE0hST/VkMLt1tEyS8t5g9rRFG0NEhe dEnhQyH1EEoCg== Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:05:18 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Wei Cc: Jiri Pirko , Sabrina Dubroca , maciek@machnikowski.net, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 1/4] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected Message-ID: <20240226070518.74898fe7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240222050840.362799-1-dw@davidwei.uk> <20240222050840.362799-2-dw@davidwei.uk> <20240223164423.6b77cf09@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:33:02 -0800 David Wei wrote: > >> + err = 0; > > > > Why zero.. > > Sorry left over from a previous iteration. > > > > >> + nsim_a = netdev_priv(dev_a); > >> + peer = rtnl_dereference(nsim_a->peer); > >> + if (peer) { > >> + pr_err("Netdevsim %d:%u is already linked\n", netnsfd_a, ifidx_a); > >> + goto out_err; > > > > I'd think if we hit this we should return -EBUSY? > > Unless peer == dev_b, but that may be splitting hair. > > What would returning -EBUSY do? This is continuation of the previous comment, you set err to zero, so when device already has a peer user will get 0 (success) They should get -EBUSY.