From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com, danielj@nvidia.com,
mst@redhat.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] netdev: add per-queue statistics
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:19:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226141928.171b79fe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zd0EJq3gS2_p9NQ8@google.com>
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:35:34 -0800 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > + -
> > + name: stats-scope
> > + type: flags
> > + entries: [ queue ]
>
> IIUC, in order to get netdev-scoped stats in v1 (vs rfc) is to not set
> stats-scope, right? Any reason we dropped the explicit netdev entry?
> It seems more robust with a separate entry and removes the ambiguity about
> which stats we're querying.
The change is because I switched from enum to flags.
I'm not 100% sure which one is going to cause fewer issues down
the line. It's a question of whether the next scope we add will
be disjoint with or subdividing previous scopes.
I think only subdividing previous scopes makes sense. If we were
to add "stats per NAPI" (bad example) or "per buffer pool" or IDK what
other thing -- we should expose that as a new netlink command, not mix
it with the queues.
The expectation is that scopes will be extended with hw vs sw, or
per-CPU (e.g. page pool recycling). In which case we'll want flags,
so that we can combine them -- ask for HW stats for a queue or hw
stats for the entire netdev.
Perhaps I should rename stats -> queue-stats to make this more explicit?
The initial version I wrote could iterate both over NAPIs and
queues. This could be helpful to some drivers - but I realized that it
would lead to rather painful user experience (does the driver maintain
stats per NAPI or per queue?) and tricky implementation of the device
level sum (device stats = Sum(queue) or Sum(queue) + Sum(NAPI)??)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 21:10 [PATCH net-next 0/3] netdev: add per-queue statistics Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-26 21:10 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-26 21:35 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-02-26 22:19 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-27 3:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-02-27 15:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-27 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-02-27 19:49 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2024-02-27 10:29 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-02-27 15:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-27 16:17 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-02-27 23:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-26 21:10 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] netdev: add queue stat for alloc failures Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-26 21:10 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] eth: bnxt: support per-queue statistics Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240226141928.171b79fe@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=danielj@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).