From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
Lukasz Czapnik <lukasz.czapnik@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 4/5] ice: Add tx_scheduling_layers devlink param
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:37:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226183700.226f887d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZdrpqCF3GWrMpt-t@nanopsycho>
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:18:00 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Do you recall any specific param that got rejected from mlx5?
> >Y'all were allowed to add the eq sizing params, which I think
> >is not going to be mlx5-only for long. Otherwise I only remember
> >cases where I'd try to push people to use the resource API, which
> >IMO is better for setting limits and delegating resources.
>
> I don't have anything solid in mind, I would have to look it up. But
> there is certainly quite big amount of uncertainties among my
> colleagues to jundge is some param would or would not be acceptable to
> you. That's why I believe it would save a lot of people time to write
> the policy down in details, with examples, etc. Could you please?
How about this? (BTW took me half an hour to write, just in case
you're wondering)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
index 4e01dc32bc08..f1eef6d065be 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
@@ -9,10 +9,12 @@ level device functionality. Since devlink can operate at the device-wide
level, it can be used to provide configuration that may affect multiple
ports on a single device.
-This document describes a number of generic parameters that are supported
-across multiple drivers. Each driver is also free to add their own
-parameters. Each driver must document the specific parameters they support,
-whether generic or not.
+There are two categories of devlink parameters - generic parameters
+and device-specific quirks. Generic devlink parameters are configuration
+knobs which don't fit into any larger API, but are supported across multiple
+drivers. This document describes a number of generic parameters.
+Each driver can also add its own parameters, which are documented in driver
+specific files.
Configuration modes
===================
@@ -137,3 +139,32 @@ own name.
* - ``event_eq_size``
- u32
- Control the size of asynchronous control events EQ.
+
+Adding new params
+=================
+
+Addition of new devlink params is carefully scrutinized upstream.
+More complete APIs (in devlink, ethtool, netdev etc.) are always preferred,
+devlink params should never be used in their place e.g. to allow easier
+delivery via out-of-tree modules, or to save development time.
+
+devlink parameters must always be thoroughly documented, both from technical
+perspective (to allow meaningful upstream review), and from user perspective
+(to allow users to make informed decisions).
+
+The requirements above should make it obvious that any "automatic" /
+"pass-through" registration of devlink parameters, based on strings
+read from the device, will not be accepted.
+
+There are two broad categories of devlink params which had been accepted
+in the past:
+
+ - device-specific configuration knobs, which cannot be inferred from
+ other device configuration. Note that the author is expected to study
+ other drivers to make sure that the configuration is in fact unique
+ to the implementation.
+
+ - configuration which must be set at device initialization time.
+ Allowing user to enable features at runtime is always preferable
+ but in reality most devices allow certain features to be enabled/disabled
+ only by changing configuration stored in NVM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 10:05 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 0/5] ice: Support 5 layer Tx scheduler topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/5] ice: Support 5 layer topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 10:16 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 2/5] ice: Adjust the VSI/Aggregator layers Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 3/5] ice: Enable switching default Tx scheduler topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 4/5] ice: Add tx_scheduling_layers devlink param Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-19 12:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-19 13:33 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-02-19 17:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-21 23:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-22 13:25 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-02-22 23:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-23 9:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-23 14:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-25 7:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-27 2:37 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-27 12:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-27 13:05 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-02-27 15:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-27 15:41 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-02-27 16:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-27 20:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-02-19 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/5] ice: Document tx_scheduling_layers parameter Mateusz Polchlopek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240226183700.226f887d@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=lukasz.czapnik@intel.com \
--cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).