From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91FE15B116 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709132670; cv=none; b=Nrs7tyLKpkeTtrKE3cM825pCnVlzMtu50inH9MJ6RYps68gh3quux3HR/uzuDg9ER89vA/9Ah2/r8rrUCHOoK5qbK1NqDFucIMVzzgJWHGTzHZFUeBDVI2tBmz7AxeUDFY6hv5Wtdzhkbvp24cNnCZn46rWi11rtxOEFcT3MkFI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709132670; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bxlS65jKUcIIlPjtM8o4MKI1ryyJX5H10x4xbVKgzQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qg8550HZNo928kZPMmm3uj1f07lPZ/paDxsjvnAmzQW9YTVsEjM6N3WIJa1QBvdfVAkzr5iVFxwdXlf4S7fnEPfvOOMzoK38K0gnSJEdXpwhH504NtOinNi2nfzWEtWJqQvQNIJCPf7Ur+zk8NmaFoj5vc01BcnPobzLNKrxT1Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=W99YsBqx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="W99YsBqx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F207AC433C7; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:04:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709132668; bh=bxlS65jKUcIIlPjtM8o4MKI1ryyJX5H10x4xbVKgzQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W99YsBqxURjgSYIfPoc40LS3B3EEqf9sNAUUfWR9LYQu/yxjDsMJlnl1DUUhDOW+i nd4YekzkqIdhAfQ1lQtHW6QvwczIbplbGVMqsidCTq+F6h3xtjJ22ZQMzot9c9T7To bcCx/G59uWtEOnknJFcLnPal8OKAe1pKE0Oeplg3wgO2ij5pAKp/grlrqTa3QSLTPz kwOdmqegfcjO06DYlGD7mEjU5SQn1u7OJy36zrc5a7XJWAY8M/oYTLVBzBWxMZb+59 KfWou4t+MIlg5VNcfziyEFotcQ5hsbe/MEAyXP9j+aqw+namYBrIrrbGksM/Rv09ew vMLLNvwdAfhig== Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:04:25 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Chengming Zhou Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chengming Zhou Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Message-ID: <20240228150425.GI292522@kernel.org> References: <20240227170937.GD277116@kernel.org> <20240228030658.3512782-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240228030658.3512782-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:06:58AM +0000, Chengming Zhou wrote: > From: Chengming Zhou > > The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag used to be implemented in SLAB, which was > removed as of v6.8-rc1, so it became a dead flag since the commit > 16a1d968358a ("mm/slab: remove mm/slab.c and slab_def.h"). And the > series[1] went on to mark it obsolete to avoid confusion for users. > Here we can just remove all its users, which has no functional change. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223-slab-cleanup-flags-v2-1-02f1753e8303@suse.cz/ > > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou > --- > v2: > - Update the patch description and include the related link to > make it clearer that SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is now a no-op. Thanks for the update. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman