netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump netdev info
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:16:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301001607.2925706-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)

Due to compiler oddness and because struct dpll_pin is defined
in a private header we have to call into dpll code to get
the handle for the pin associated with a netdev.
Combine getting the pin pointer and getting the info into
a single function call by having the helpers take a netdev
pointer, rather than expecting a pin.

The exports are note needed, networking core can't be a module.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
BTW is the empty nest if the netdev has no pin intentional?
Should we add a comment explaining why it's there?

CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
CC: jiri@resnulli.us
---
 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c    |  5 -----
 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/dpll.h        | 19 ++++++-------------
 net/core/rtnetlink.c        |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 12fcd420396e..a87bf95216c1 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ struct dpll_pin_registration {
 	void *priv;
 };
 
-struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->dpll_pin);
-}
-
 struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id)
 {
 	if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 1419fd0d241c..9be4ae35fea2 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  */
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <net/genetlink.h>
 #include "dpll_core.h"
 #include "dpll_netlink.h"
@@ -47,18 +48,6 @@ dpll_msg_add_dev_parent_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, u32 id)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/**
- * dpll_msg_pin_handle_size - get size of pin handle attribute for given pin
- * @pin: pin pointer
- *
- * Return: byte size of pin handle attribute for given pin.
- */
-size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
-{
-	return pin ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_pin_handle_size);
-
 /**
  * dpll_msg_add_pin_handle - attach pin handle attribute to a given message
  * @msg: pointer to sk_buff message to attach a pin handle
@@ -68,7 +57,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_pin_handle_size);
  * * 0 - success
  * * -EMSGSIZE - no space in message to attach pin handle
  */
-int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
 {
 	if (!pin)
 		return 0;
@@ -76,7 +65,28 @@ int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_add_pin_handle);
+
+static struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->dpll_pin);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size - get size of pin handle attribute of a netdev
+ * @dev: netdev from which to get the pin
+ *
+ * Return: byte size of pin handle attribute, or 0 if @dev has no pin.
+ */
+size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return netdev_dpll_pin(dev) ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
+}
+
+int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
+			       const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+}
 
 static int
 dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
index e3abde993244..ff14d1e88f87 100644
--- a/include/linux/dpll.h
+++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
@@ -123,15 +123,17 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
 };
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
-size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
-int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
+size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev);
+int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
+			       const struct net_device *dev);
 #else
-static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static inline size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static inline int
+dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -170,13 +172,4 @@ int dpll_device_change_ntf(struct dpll_device *dpll);
 
 int dpll_pin_change_ntf(struct dpll_pin *pin);
 
-#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
-static inline struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	return NULL;
-}
-#else
-struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev);
-#endif
-
 #endif
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 780b330f8ef9..e0353487c57e 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	size_t size = nla_total_size(0); /* nest IFLA_DPLL_PIN */
 
-	size += dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+	size += dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(dev);
 
 	return size;
 }
@@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int rtnl_fill_dpll_pin(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!dpll_pin_nest)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
-	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(skb, netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+	ret = dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(skb, dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto nest_cancel;
 
-- 
2.43.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01  0:16 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-01 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump netdev info Jiri Pirko
2024-03-01 16:24   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-03-01 17:31     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-02  9:36       ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240301001607.2925706-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).