From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EA28BFC for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709314290; cv=none; b=tRF5WQjzWhFcf9cqp6OT5r/pToEJAimMvM8fw4P8Ejgi5aXNpe6Yw0kwg4kcIpS4tisoTWTJP0MhjT9k2/4wBCh2td81+5ycGv7IzjF/qotZsIwx4R5olY1LW3vPCoWSqN53CsKIm+rAESEtLfUBQVd/kLOuRpvey2ekHe3bd0c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709314290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bwGV8WlkahX4hxvSdXSXuYuVskmQYNb6IgUCB5DjjXI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AHfEzi8pB1yfol76qXHz3KuTmIr5+1nCoY/tIZmZUf72ulUGHfU59QyXHDizUuPek9TyhCVkFQaSM0ejHn4WenlV7R2DYUerR19AV99oVUbDfd7NJMo6tpVdWvFLGiPZxFiZ0JNfiZEWMUINvj0pqeTKD6cv86Zaj0HtwvGUa6U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cdcOWCtT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cdcOWCtT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7262BC433C7; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:31:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709314289; bh=bwGV8WlkahX4hxvSdXSXuYuVskmQYNb6IgUCB5DjjXI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cdcOWCtTOAT9NAJV6TTkXorQThX8jJNX7oPQE3Uk+qkSi7IHOQI/ZlSclWbZwgs1D kItxbO2N1k2i5Wp29d3kQuXdl7CTtewaAtN3Jl6Wlq5gZwFaONONYm8mFsh35KAbQa TXz31nC50i26IyPaZGrJsAyhJEPgz0ZT+w4GXUhQ68b3WcASwop6qlqvq/IVGgCYQZ GE/ktWMijlf/TH1WPhOc3MtD8xepPKkq1Q+kMwDrvz4g6ZgdD0c+9OtoW0IqcqDiJP b0YnNKtBkjABy4mleMRZq1hLGuiVVpCGNMNsXyXFV/z3MjwUjRMKNvcrTDWvjfkIoS mpmLa4SkR3+cw== Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:31:28 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Eric Dumazet , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump netdev info Message-ID: <20240301093128.18722960@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240301001607.2925706-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:24:07 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote: > > >BTW is the empty nest if the netdev has no pin intentional? > > > > The user can tell if this is or is not supported by kernel easily. Seems legit, although user can also do: $ genl ctrl list | grep dpll Name: dpll > This is a high cost for hosts with hundreds of devices :/ right, a bit high cost for a relatively rare feature :(