From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD58A7494; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 05:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709443624; cv=none; b=RY1XqDO36yvi+bQOPpOjJrv25NHpMapxtJBS2e3W3yejT7uZ394mucdzkYjJqtBQUrpdpAcsgQSz5s+8ByK8P7FKSHAxqQf/VpNvU5CKSywkmO7DCBbwnuMORwA0D5FxyPb9JA5hFuyTvl4SvWsIDU3n2FoBhAokRChv+1ISPDw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709443624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SbwC5DYIzEhEfg+itSOhS1E+hnKBAn/SGhRX9oPjDyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SKwdPGyA79ioZObMPD1SVNagJS84d+fTIkscafB945xttYhU80jJaMbs9HcqEbZFqH0mETZkcjqzeMaILki7obpYHEh28GySTFk/fZNNkHCPfxS0dO4X+tKn4mxAx/g64e5SxnQfLJ0MW3oOnQUINInVCn7VKzRdw5miQIwGJR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aLrj/do7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aLrj/do7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D668EC433F1; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 05:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709443624; bh=SbwC5DYIzEhEfg+itSOhS1E+hnKBAn/SGhRX9oPjDyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aLrj/do7VCBv0e1MON7hI+DYAAz93a6PKNkU5r24/IZVdWCvC6l5N7TKMPGz3n7TU rmkHetrx+6voNx+b00ljuTs/AJkNdbAKi7ELrgvu0nt+TyCJui9nuu7yBWv2BS95H1 uK2/4mDacsXKyFtPHto+q6r2flGUywNGMME+czeLuRGx61IkRZqKgUYmz9/zvfR3QG QIA59+7Idy/jlAcRThzlL/W99rsDoCN09cKf7s5YJ9G9sWPUlLjpa469I0W/teWmRi Nk9d8krOA+9ESAJ9I4MO8J0piU6woetqPrURsmh6eu1dfwwvhFKuYEL6inMmbWqhWE Ajnld+mHKj1Nw== Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 21:27:02 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Howells Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 18/21] rxrpc: Use ktimes for call timeout tracking and set the timer lazily Message-ID: <20240302212702.15b04552@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240301163807.385573-19-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20240301163807.385573-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20240301163807.385573-19-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:37:50 +0000 David Howells wrote: > Track the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies as the latter's > granularity is too high and only set the timer at the end of the event > handling function. This one has a 64b div somewhere, breaks 32b builds. -- pw-bot: cr