From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: make sure drive strength configuration is not lost by soft reset
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:14:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305191457.37419bd4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305064802.2478971-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 07:48:02 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This driver has two separate reset sequence in different places:
> - gpio/HW reset on start of ksz_switch_register()
> - SW reset on start of ksz_setup()
>
> The second one will overwrite drive strength configuration made in the
> ksz_switch_register().
>
> To fix it, move ksz_parse_drive_strength() from ksz_switch_register() to
> ksz_setup().
>
> Fixes: d67d7247f641 ("net: dsa: microchip: Add drive strength configuration")
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hm, this is much larger than I anticipated, and also doesn't apply,
so there will be conflict with -next. Andrew, should we go back to
the v1?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 6:48 [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: make sure drive strength configuration is not lost by soft reset Oleksij Rempel
2024-03-05 8:03 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2024-03-06 3:14 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-06 3:29 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2024-03-06 6:03 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-03-07 9:03 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-03-07 17:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240305191457.37419bd4@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).