From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74038DDA8; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709694899; cv=none; b=GTdCdQ78im61o1qT5KtcY/A3OKI2vaUEYEj6Niw4IZP2bhkiAA6MACTsa3HBVxRd3UTYc6vVFjjQvzrr5Cc2PYZpvxARQh7MthjWhNTXGpUSfrL1amqAMaW5KHaM7G2Q5PspP6kAHdr3hTaEJddjOE+rBexqvogQohK1zd1u8KQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709694899; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ADX2aLUl83Ht7eqwNw1wCGw/JUzgdAjweDaoeaKB7Mc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T6KjvLSCealSrrewMZkbFORl7JfX2oCH/e5QsacHKLJnaV9ayQYrixX/eKHK+CTqb44tM0+m9hgah01MZv8QX0RF/7A1gxbdGOZa33P82wRWqhHbTYQOFKUImOE7ssi7rBBOBbKagzoGyy/pUp54d4BWid0y+7nYX6myVvPYaDU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HaoY3I0S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HaoY3I0S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8626AC433C7; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:14:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709694899; bh=ADX2aLUl83Ht7eqwNw1wCGw/JUzgdAjweDaoeaKB7Mc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HaoY3I0S1NwcF2DBr3I9Cxc1FOlamxDp+JDDN8xxcm2o/mDu3zGWJinEZpq/kYoSu x5uXks4LYHCZBbNvMnvTBXpvdPAW5dLYSdQBEhsJ5Fsv7HB3yLOI0zrVS7JqqqKRjM ZXsoAEEPumhDKeMBs9i4vF0Cc3+yBcKYbaDea5kFLAAvK6D35rpzzQruUce1cKe47c DgMeNdh7CA/70d2o2ic7Ql5d9Q5rnfv20qyuGXY4RC3iGuKBwBj19FzwBh7pVl3Jpn ZcL+kl63zKt+3PinT/A9PCulnEqB9xXjnrLopTxUVT7xB0OeJxCAtN4twaoGGHuCwY 4cyeFCzYLo/+A== Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:14:57 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Oleksij Rempel , Andrew Lunn Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , Woojung Huh , Arun Ramadoss , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: make sure drive strength configuration is not lost by soft reset Message-ID: <20240305191457.37419bd4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240305064802.2478971-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> References: <20240305064802.2478971-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 07:48:02 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > This driver has two separate reset sequence in different places: > - gpio/HW reset on start of ksz_switch_register() > - SW reset on start of ksz_setup() > > The second one will overwrite drive strength configuration made in the > ksz_switch_register(). > > To fix it, move ksz_parse_drive_strength() from ksz_switch_register() to > ksz_setup(). > > Fixes: d67d7247f641 ("net: dsa: microchip: Add drive strength configuration") > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel Hm, this is much larger than I anticipated, and also doesn't apply, so there will be conflict with -next. Andrew, should we go back to the v1?