From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:41:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311134144.7b1e1a34@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240303190339.52496-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com>
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 20:03:38 +0100 Piotr Wejman wrote:
> The driver should ensure that same priority is not mapped to multiple
> rx queues. Currently rx_queue_priority() function is adding
> priorities for a queue without clearing them from others.
Do you know what user-visible mis-behavior this may result in?
> From DesignWare Cores Ethernet Quality-of-Service
> Databook, section 17.1.29 MAC_RxQ_Ctrl2:
> "[...]The software must ensure that the content of this field is
> mutually exclusive to the PSRQ fields for other queues, that is,
> the same priority is not mapped to multiple Rx queues[...]"
>
> After this patch, rx_queue_priority() function will:
> - assign desired priorities to a queue
> - remove those priorities from all other queues
But also you seem to remove clearing all other prios from the queue:
- value &= ~GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
and
- value &= ~XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
is that intentional? Commit message should explain why.
> The write sequence of CTRL2 and CTRL3 registers is done in the way to
> ensure this order.
Ensure which order? Looks like you're actually writing in the opposite
order than what I'd expect :S First the register you want to assign to,
and then the register you only clear from.
When you repost please include a Fixes tag.
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-03 19:03 [PATCH v3] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment Piotr Wejman
2024-03-11 20:41 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-04-01 17:48 ` Piotr Wejman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240311134144.7b1e1a34@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piotrwejman90@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).