From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E791FBF0; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710868250; cv=none; b=elb8adzisoqXY60locy52P+nPI/r+BKubVHu1EfBCRMZD9iqSNfDInIi+jIxaZKAlcn64MWhuT1UYkgciVupTuPmLzxy61RqkPgVq/u8ypgXGpYt48tk6qtMwx/DFf0CJRX5f+14FnBFjxjd5b+HY18dJtH6cSGKekLBzWtc12A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710868250; c=relaxed/simple; bh=chLaU/1e7fuTEiGMQDP7fwuUnBlDqgypzyaFA4B5D/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RYf7MS6AGZsFHqBQ7MOu6tO3nPY+PRBc3Tj/LnOnOUinlOzasq8EJpl7KoFZ8Yyn6owIum1QqM29jHtgU1riq1oKeYdiz/oNPqA68xn5irHRmdswbSIlx+gkBp9KRZUNlJQ9r0HCAIJTqTJW6Jr+JLyZAa1MzQhMhbwZfXGBhg4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=E0+JBnNM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="E0+JBnNM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AE7AC433C7; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:10:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710868249; bh=chLaU/1e7fuTEiGMQDP7fwuUnBlDqgypzyaFA4B5D/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E0+JBnNMxAhJUtYep+rLCG3N2uUAuNHcnVZgVDffhTTd+iN+UKC8dIMKaaKqlQG3+ A+jXW1KsbnYkcxKExsQcgjhDzmN+FtMhlWpsdYDx7Db0eSmv2fbKcRqgI4YwIfy+Cn KkxK2XTNMqCKjC+eOvahe7rQAPxIwNIynDAjzAd4lSbdv+6etCfQJRn32mY+qmr/9h E3gY/+mIlS1X5v8yeB0hJOUjRQses4i/eGVchqbNNeG357DrTD3YPoDHWz9/dQzjTg oZmALqkVwr9hPcK3VboINeB3spT07mnCtyc87TEk32SjUf1pObrrHkVvu2DaaIiSB7 GY4ZrICEkUy0Q== Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:10:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Mark Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Eric Dumazet , Breno Leitao , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: support sending over raw IP interfaces Message-ID: <20240319101048.5b7c6949@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <93E237FA-9F0B-48E4-8A89-B9C2619B90A5@yotsuba.nl> References: <20240313124613.51399-1-mark@yotsuba.nl> <20240314113455.152cebc9@kernel.org> <93E237FA-9F0B-48E4-8A89-B9C2619B90A5@yotsuba.nl> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:47:46 +0100 Mark wrote: > > Would be great if this could come with a simple selftest under > > tools/testing/selftests/net. Preferably using some simple tunnel > > device, rather than wg to limit tooling dependencies ;) > > Yes, that makes a lot of sense. I wrote a selftest that tests netconsole > using IPIP and GRE tunnels, and they too seem to work correctly and pass (and > more importantly, fail without the patch ;-). Would you prefer me to submit > a v2 with that test now, or when net-next reopens in a week? Feel free to post as [RFC net-next v2] now. I can't guarantee people will find the time to review, but it shouldn't hurt to have it on the list :)