From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2105C1DDC5; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711565610; cv=none; b=NAONeEpZIBgh6V2UK+HdHrUrHCB6JIlKT2BHAst09GiU7MEwhMavo4Lr6ljiec8mnMQI8E/3Muar5Iwd+9q3RhmmQxh/R5w3m/nZjy/b7DNILmIVdzvLG8dKwbuPDxnHUpaP5OyNUpcDbOMbQ76zG7JWkX7NEbk9st4HonUOrDE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711565610; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+O32pSKiKxZOrZ1z6j0vD3Kyh3AW1ZjH2V9CfSPZsUo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Mn296hZUAJeMEJozO9p3I4FRhB9KDG+hQ0BKCo/UKTfUs8KmgnlHFVvHFX9vTK+luBKE8/8PbWIcJ4NhTZ61guVV7zRAk//mkXg4J4mN7xrI3PyzSX/0L2gb9JE20IURKzJsgt/VpNiv4XdiHEorj/oMZAlJAUkz7v2PcjefQfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hspFMTyK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hspFMTyK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3484CC433F1; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711565609; bh=+O32pSKiKxZOrZ1z6j0vD3Kyh3AW1ZjH2V9CfSPZsUo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hspFMTyK2qH06drosYNkCR8bPwEwK6OeRHek3DQFlGPDm+QyFobZ0Gxn0kJX7KKBw 4K7bFQUrvTH4tV4hPok/fHV9LbLkiEWJbdBRb1oXpMNwLSZpOPuoZtLsHbYPslgrUq kcEdkzMvpvOD3MXgKCX1mAw9JXfSzDc95kiFv9WkEuk8Sl5Hi1Ow+UBqcCuURDOehE 3gi6iBdGjBpUQl47w+A78Ec3YgmJKW709PqFvTO8wx8Dgf9wYurl2hVW0GWSDS6jxi w5IBH+uRMqIUn5YhRocoddfTsbs5eIDFHPm4D7VNouXCgCy7hcaTw9J9qa6JibSsX8 YDERBj6zgvjhg== Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:53:28 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Eric Van Hensbergen" Cc: asmadeus@codewreck.org, "Lizhi Xu" , syzbot+7a3d75905ea1a830dbe5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com, lucho@ionkov.net, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, regressions@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH next] fs/9p: fix uaf in in v9fs_stat2inode_dotl Message-ID: <20240327115328.22c5b5a3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240322081312.2a8a4908@kernel.org> References: <00000000000055ecb906105ed669@google.com> <20240202121531.2550018-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> <20240321182824.6f303e38@kernel.org> <20240322081312.2a8a4908@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:13:12 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:26:07 +0000 Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > > Patch is in the unapplied portion of my for-next tree along with > > another one. I was hoping to hear some feedback on the other one > > before i did a pull request and was torn on whether or not I wait on > > -rc1 to send since we are so close. > > My guess would be that quite a few folks use 9p for in-VM kernel > testing. Real question is how many actually update their work tree > before -rc1 or even -rc2, given the anticipated merge window code > instability.. so maybe there's no extreme urgency? > > From netdev's perspective, FWIW, it'd be great if the fix reached > Linux before Thursday, which is when we will forward our tree again. Any progress on getting the fix to Linus? I didn't spot it getting merged. I'm a bit surprised there aren't more people complaining TBH I'd have thought any CI setup with KASAN enabled has a good chance of hitting this..