Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove RTNL protection from ip6addrlbl_dump()
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 12:39:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240403123913.4173904-1-edumazet@google.com> (raw)

No longer hold RTNL while calling ip6addrlbl_dump()
("ip addrlabel show")

ip6addrlbl_dump() was already mostly relying on RCU anyway.

Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations around
net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq

Also change return value for a completed dump,
so that NLMSG_DONE can be appended to current skb,
saving one recvmsg() system call.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
index 17ac45aa7194ce9c148ed95e14dd575d17feeb98..961e853543b64cd2060ef693ae3ad32a44780aa1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ static int __ip6addrlbl_add(struct net *net, struct ip6addrlbl_entry *newp,
 		hlist_add_head_rcu(&newp->list, &net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.head);
 out:
 	if (!ret)
-		net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq++;
+		WRITE_ONCE(net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq,
+			   net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq + 1);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -445,7 +446,7 @@ static void ip6addrlbl_putmsg(struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 };
 
 static int ip6addrlbl_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
-			   struct ip6addrlbl_entry *p,
+			   const struct ip6addrlbl_entry *p,
 			   u32 lseq,
 			   u32 portid, u32 seq, int event,
 			   unsigned int flags)
@@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	struct ip6addrlbl_entry *p;
 	int idx = 0, s_idx = cb->args[0];
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	if (cb->strict_check) {
 		err = ip6addrlbl_valid_dump_req(nlh, cb->extack);
@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.head, list) {
 		if (idx >= s_idx) {
 			err = ip6addrlbl_fill(skb, p,
-					      net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq,
+					      READ_ONCE(net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq),
 					      NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 					      nlh->nlmsg_seq,
 					      RTM_NEWADDRLABEL,
@@ -522,7 +523,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	cb->args[0] = idx;
-	return skb->len;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static inline int ip6addrlbl_msgsize(void)
@@ -614,7 +615,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	p = __ipv6_addr_label(net, addr, ipv6_addr_type(addr), ifal->ifal_index);
-	lseq = net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq;
+	lseq = READ_ONCE(net->ipv6.ip6addrlbl_table.seq);
 	if (p)
 		err = ip6addrlbl_fill(skb, p, lseq,
 				      NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
@@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ int __init ipv6_addr_label_rtnl_register(void)
 		return ret;
 	ret = rtnl_register_module(THIS_MODULE, PF_INET6, RTM_GETADDRLABEL,
 				   ip6addrlbl_get,
-				   ip6addrlbl_dump, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
+				   ip6addrlbl_dump, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED |
+						    RTNL_FLAG_DUMP_UNLOCKED);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-03 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 12:39 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2024-04-03 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove RTNL protection from ip6addrlbl_dump() David Ahern
2024-04-03 16:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-04-03 17:49     ` David Ahern
2024-04-03 17:55       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240403123913.4173904-1-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox