From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:36:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240405143641.GA5865@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e31497c3d655c237c106c97e8eaf6a72bcb562f.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:29:55PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Personally I'd go with a temporary variable here if only to make the
> lines a bit shorter and easier to read. I also think above is not
> correct for allocation failure since folio_address() accesses folio-
> >page without first checking for NULL. So I'm guessing the NULL check
> needs to move and be done on the temporary struct folio*.
Yes, it needs a local variable to NULL check the folio_alloc return.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 15:41 [PATCH net 0/1] s390/ism: Fix splice for SMC-D Gerd Bayer
2024-03-28 15:41 ` [PATCH net 1/1] s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation Gerd Bayer
2024-03-28 15:59 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-04 8:13 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-04-04 11:10 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-05 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-05 10:42 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-05 11:29 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-04-05 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-15 13:28 ` Gerd Bayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240405143641.GA5865@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).