From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EEEEA50 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 05:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712382391; cv=none; b=KWufb3tQSik1oeV9SNf1a3iMasXu5SOOjVISeCH3skN/s4iFMttQCpvUQ58dUFqWbr52A6bG70KSjnMGOEDSXs7QNum1C9orcYL0PkyhXLuISwcDzRnfnuWL95DjDZJfJhp+ftCFBKxCuHCzph/sAwb9w0ypnpf0ifbRSjUhReI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712382391; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rh5H7ixZCofyZ7cuscRQW9/f2MSZZ4IH6V51+zEH7l0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FgXKS8Luix38WX01JLzS/o6tTuNMFDS/NnNohopQ67nbfMDc9ptbqpE7/9bX3bkum7gOM8m5eqJmLk7z2vByrgFDPykNh82AjLW3kv5Vpp9t/yghz4OM4rB21LZeiu2FtwGSDWuIqYO9QxTVd9wWZVFYXptaSbXvRTSRhCdf/Fw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cjBDtGns; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cjBDtGns" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B55AC433C7; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 05:46:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712382391; bh=Rh5H7ixZCofyZ7cuscRQW9/f2MSZZ4IH6V51+zEH7l0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cjBDtGns4BwIlwlOuW0XIkLK7GBrp1XJcFpn6TXDyfYctYaKgEKnWhU2+MhY6A5d1 OppLbnySCBPGbhd6jtUwpGOAyHPou5AkYygQh3vuyv8R7MqlCGSDb2a4vrP6o7xacW UQ7fq4wCWY33R2WtIAG9Lra2Zob35ifOitkTdwA/7E/7nLoc2M35imRpbtio1niVCs hAn5sdoYe5Mb7g00ulHC1vp1UhJLwi1hdzXi+Faxl4mO+aMttxZP7GJDKvHhZxRuPH dypmhveIIi87Ej8DAKMPdzr+INwEemljJSgMZ5qUwibe+v1h8E7P9YqEFtzOw9F4pd K1Xrf26DlPcZA== Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:46:29 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rahul Rameshbabu Cc: Tariq Toukan , Carolina Jubran , Simon Horman , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ethtool: add interface to read representor Rx statistics Message-ID: <20240405224629.1f5a77b7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <87ttkf2h71.fsf@nvidia.com> References: <20240404173357.123307-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20240404173357.123307-4-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20240405215335.7a5601ca@kernel.org> <87ttkf2h71.fsf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:25:21 -0700 Rahul Rameshbabu wrote: > > In more trivial remarks - kernel-doc script apparently doesn't want > > the group to be documented (any more?) > > I took a look, and I believe the behavior of kernel-doc has remained the > same since the struct_group() helper macro was introduced. That said, I > think allowing the documentation of struct_group() would be a reasonable > choice/maybe worth updating the script. Thanks for investigating! Dunno why this started getting hit so much out of the sudden.