From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C832710F1; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712713222; cv=none; b=ikLIZ6s66K7dGNR4/vp+UjxcUaPL6yDzmZh/IL/gNShJ+Ikg0dVrb3nhIl1FIWd8Qi228HtgZeWDwshG4QhQbrZstL0F/QaXxZuEOcCa0UFZueLcDjD12wNleZQRFlxzhcYd7wAadcgQiYa1aDse4oNy44AL7BpWdStsNug7KLI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712713222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cL1meAldF9lys+VQ+fiked9/RI+8Snr6xCIact96PqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CrdbSWEuB5K145yT2vUMBCeVvQLl3iOj+TtNhkAQBGEu7NXwpSEc9IFN333PcXbH2qxchmJSxqx2M1DXnwwlGz9yhMRcClydcJXaL6EinBEJrHuLWiXfo07dvsAIq7h0kY9JFjLyJEQFOj7JrSZuE33zp182cIy+jB/0/fkmh2w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MRUkRKNw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MRUkRKNw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB0A8C433F1; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:40:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712713222; bh=cL1meAldF9lys+VQ+fiked9/RI+8Snr6xCIact96PqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MRUkRKNw25gvh5rP8IRcbq/JG7dw9Eam5R1mAJEbtzG2z564AFcH3FziPKU/2wRrP q5+lA+gRdcQuYtJxWrXMmMqxm/RtEYPeUBhNl9+lGd+gvggXWtAmD2GnAvPGPRNGkg 5ilCeqfetgTMJKRvnAUqMpn3XxwbKCbJvu9zx7ttfueD6jtWrUH0s5uxKaxR8ZFcc+ 5oDEDwVCy1gPZ4NT4/0jcWXOzbmP2HFRYWIGjOVzYTKj/pEbKaAGgkEwn2E9T8+gRr XrVHVzRMmMUexjW2tSEwIJZZGD3lbvJBJyrd58d1quIZJWasJQa2XQYgdAu36ICs96 t/K2+z1n9h62g== Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:40:20 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Heng Qi Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ratheesh Kannoth , Alexander Lobakin , Xuan Zhuo Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] virtio-net: support dim profile fine-tuning Message-ID: <20240409184020.648bc93c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1712664204-83147-5-git-send-email-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1712664204-83147-1-git-send-email-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> <1712664204-83147-5-git-send-email-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 20:03:24 +0800 Heng Qi wrote: > + /* DIM profile list */ > + struct dim_cq_moder rx_eqe_conf[NET_DIM_PARAMS_NUM_PROFILES]; Can you please wrap this into a structure with other necessary information and add a pointer in struct net_device instead. What's the point of every single driver implementing the same boilerplate memcpy() in its get_coalesce / set_coalesce callbacks?