Re: [PATCH net] Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation"

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 09:16 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 13:37 +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 58effa3476536215530c9ec4910ffc981613b413.
> > > Review was not finished on this patch. So it's not ready for
> > > upstreaming.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > It's not a big deal (no need to repost), but should the need arise
> > again in the future it would be better explicitly marking the
> > reverted commit in the tag area as 'Fixes'. The full hash in the
> > commit message will likely save the day to stable teams, but better
> > safe then sorry!
> 
> Thanks Paolo for the explanation. I was not even sure if the commit
> hash of the erroneous commit will remain stable when this tree will be
> merged upstream. In my (naive?) view this could be "autosquashed" into
> nothing at the time of the merge.

net and net-next hashes are always stable.

> But since there appears to be time for the next pull request to
> upstream, I'll send a new version of the original patch with all the
> review comments addressed.

It looks like this commit was accepted, so we have what it is.