From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6921BF37 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713092739; cv=none; b=bx+aUFhwXiEDM+RbO90W1wibfcae4O90fwyLUOAgi1P+8EzCuk3CAnO3s9brrzwjJ5Ulr3l1Eu1UxHuvozxL+JBT55JBMe93eXduP66CR+EjgVc7uuJOSru4a/806xDMqKnrZ2JwdeLmhYO/7n65TBVLZsRgrjHeZDkSLEPRHac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713092739; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Po+EHAbE5Ggqd+PW5d3iYZvMiyHUsoX7RVKJVW2MmvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u6i3cv1HzapStscekxpSplDlR59uxMhncndufow90zdDKBaPR4vIdZWDyXxe3a1gCUuqURtKs1aYNZhhKKRNz5wbZJIwyKdYGZFplWOyCmd39eLXphUD4Cdw4gq6fGM/8EygusVzZXhQI0BaWABgwv7a+zlmxnEGp2xVTU9kBrw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DkVRzQfv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DkVRzQfv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8876DC072AA; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:05:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713092739; bh=Po+EHAbE5Ggqd+PW5d3iYZvMiyHUsoX7RVKJVW2MmvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DkVRzQfvbYCT6b2lHaq8VhOK/aG3b00ROEasYAtKcLVa5UQ8Fgl9KlsM+iEylRj7N ZhOiJbC61t6Agy6bb3IveuHsSLF+PLywSuxgHNyXZwe0EM5yp4h40tG4MBHkPFosgo G+3GdOCS2vF5l7d76cQlYLoj0tU/9StZ/q44bs1lrPUQCwSsEw3fTEODoAwbZ5Bvci c8aSOw9MOfacIIy+pHY2AxKdC0DIeu1EYF0xQNNudKVtPxdBtr/E9zNCqqAth2zo9H mO5FWt5i8S7O416yXM+HWLhlPqxZ0ciB4a+rbr+OONcq+Ls1a8N4wE+sYKNuOkJc17 oMcJFco+S9H/A== Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:05:34 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Steffen Klassert Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@linux-ipsec.org, Paul Wouters , Antony Antony , Tobias Brunner , Daniel Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/3] xfrm: Add support for per cpu xfrm state handling. Message-ID: <20240414110534.GD645060@kernel.org> References: <20240412060553.3483630-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> <20240412060553.3483630-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240412060553.3483630-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 08:05:51AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: ... > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c ... > @@ -1115,13 +1120,18 @@ static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x, > &fl->u.__fl_common)) > return; > > + if (x->pcpu_num != UINT_MAX && x->pcpu_num != pcpu_id) > + return; > + > if (!*best || > + ((*best)->pcpu_num == UINT_MAX && x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id) || > (*best)->km.dying > x->km.dying || > ((*best)->km.dying == x->km.dying && > (*best)->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time)) > *best = x; > } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) { > - *acq_in_progress = 1; > + if (!*best || (*best && x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id)) Hi Steffen, a minor nit from my side: I think this can be expressed as follows. if (!*best || x->pcpu_num == pcpu_id) Flagged by Coccinelle > + *acq_in_progress = 1; > } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR || > x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) { > if ((!x->sel.family || ...