From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
mwojtas@chromium.org, "Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: link_topology: Don't stub-away the topology creation
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:09:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240417230920.054d8803@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417180721.GA3212605@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Hello Nathan,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:07:21 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:27:05PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Some of the phy_link_topology operations are protected by IS_REACHABLE,
> > which can lead to scenarios where the consumer, built as modules, sees the topology
> > unstubbed, whereas the initialization didn't occur.
> >
> > Don't stub away the creation of the topology, it has no dependency on
> > any other parts like phylib, so we can make it always available.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2e11b89d-100f-49e7-9c9a-834cc0b82f97@gmail.com/
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240409201553.GA4124869@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
> > ---
> > Hi Nathan, Heiner,
> >
> > I'm currently at EOSS, so I'm sending this patch without having been
> > able to properly test it (build-tested only), but as this addresses an
> > issue for people using -next, I'm sending this anyway, sorry about that.
>
> No worries, thanks for continuing to take a look. Unfortunately, this
> patch fails to build during the linking stage for me with my
> configuration:
>
> x86_64-linux-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `free_netdev':
> net/core/dev.c:11060:(.text+0xb14030): undefined reference to `phy_link_topo_destroy'
> x86_64-linux-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `alloc_netdev_mqs':
> net/core/dev.c:10966:(.text+0xb142d6): undefined reference to `phy_link_topo_create'
Heh serves me well for trying to go too fast :) phy_link_topo_create
then need to compile unconditionally, so I'm indeed missing some bits
here.
Thanks a lot for testing,
Maxime
>
> > Hopefully it can address the issue for now, I haven't given-up on your
> > idea to introduce a config option Heiner :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Maxime
> >
> > include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h | 15 ---------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h b/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > index 0a6479055745..61e2592f24ac 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > @@ -4,22 +4,7 @@
> >
> > struct phy_link_topology;
> >
> > -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_PHYLIB)
> > -
> > struct phy_link_topology *phy_link_topo_create(struct net_device *dev);
> > void phy_link_topo_destroy(struct phy_link_topology *topo);
> >
> > -#else
> > -
> > -static inline struct phy_link_topology *phy_link_topo_create(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > - return NULL;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline void phy_link_topo_destroy(struct phy_link_topology *topo)
> > -{
> > -}
> > -
> > -#endif
> > -
> > #endif /* __PHY_LINK_TOPOLOGY_CORE_H */
> > --
> > 2.44.0
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 14:27 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: link_topology: Don't stub-away the topology creation Maxime Chevallier
2024-04-17 18:07 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-17 21:09 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240417230920.054d8803@fedora \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).