From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
shuah@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/4] netlink: move extack writing helpers
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:35:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240420023543.3300306-3-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240420023543.3300306-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Next change will need them in netlink_dump_done(), pure move.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index dc8c3c01d51b..c5bb09597831 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -2165,6 +2165,69 @@ __nlmsg_put(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq, int type, int len, int fla
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__nlmsg_put);
+static size_t
+netlink_ack_tlv_len(struct netlink_sock *nlk, int err,
+ const struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ size_t tlvlen;
+
+ if (!extack || !test_bit(NETLINK_F_EXT_ACK, &nlk->flags))
+ return 0;
+
+ tlvlen = 0;
+ if (extack->_msg)
+ tlvlen += nla_total_size(strlen(extack->_msg) + 1);
+ if (extack->cookie_len)
+ tlvlen += nla_total_size(extack->cookie_len);
+
+ /* Following attributes are only reported as error (not warning) */
+ if (!err)
+ return tlvlen;
+
+ if (extack->bad_attr)
+ tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
+ if (extack->policy)
+ tlvlen += netlink_policy_dump_attr_size_estimate(extack->policy);
+ if (extack->miss_type)
+ tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
+ if (extack->miss_nest)
+ tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
+
+ return tlvlen;
+}
+
+static void
+netlink_ack_tlv_fill(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err,
+ const struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ if (extack->_msg)
+ WARN_ON(nla_put_string(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MSG, extack->_msg));
+ if (extack->cookie_len)
+ WARN_ON(nla_put(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_COOKIE,
+ extack->cookie_len, extack->cookie));
+
+ if (!err)
+ return;
+
+ if (extack->bad_attr &&
+ !WARN_ON((u8 *)extack->bad_attr < in_skb->data ||
+ (u8 *)extack->bad_attr >= in_skb->data + in_skb->len))
+ WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_OFFS,
+ (u8 *)extack->bad_attr - (u8 *)nlh));
+ if (extack->policy)
+ netlink_policy_dump_write_attr(skb, extack->policy,
+ NLMSGERR_ATTR_POLICY);
+ if (extack->miss_type)
+ WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_TYPE,
+ extack->miss_type));
+ if (extack->miss_nest &&
+ !WARN_ON((u8 *)extack->miss_nest < in_skb->data ||
+ (u8 *)extack->miss_nest > in_skb->data + in_skb->len))
+ WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_NEST,
+ (u8 *)extack->miss_nest - (u8 *)nlh));
+}
+
/*
* It looks a bit ugly.
* It would be better to create kernel thread.
@@ -2406,69 +2469,6 @@ int __netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netlink_dump_start);
-static size_t
-netlink_ack_tlv_len(struct netlink_sock *nlk, int err,
- const struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
-{
- size_t tlvlen;
-
- if (!extack || !test_bit(NETLINK_F_EXT_ACK, &nlk->flags))
- return 0;
-
- tlvlen = 0;
- if (extack->_msg)
- tlvlen += nla_total_size(strlen(extack->_msg) + 1);
- if (extack->cookie_len)
- tlvlen += nla_total_size(extack->cookie_len);
-
- /* Following attributes are only reported as error (not warning) */
- if (!err)
- return tlvlen;
-
- if (extack->bad_attr)
- tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
- if (extack->policy)
- tlvlen += netlink_policy_dump_attr_size_estimate(extack->policy);
- if (extack->miss_type)
- tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
- if (extack->miss_nest)
- tlvlen += nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
-
- return tlvlen;
-}
-
-static void
-netlink_ack_tlv_fill(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err,
- const struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
-{
- if (extack->_msg)
- WARN_ON(nla_put_string(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MSG, extack->_msg));
- if (extack->cookie_len)
- WARN_ON(nla_put(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_COOKIE,
- extack->cookie_len, extack->cookie));
-
- if (!err)
- return;
-
- if (extack->bad_attr &&
- !WARN_ON((u8 *)extack->bad_attr < in_skb->data ||
- (u8 *)extack->bad_attr >= in_skb->data + in_skb->len))
- WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_OFFS,
- (u8 *)extack->bad_attr - (u8 *)nlh));
- if (extack->policy)
- netlink_policy_dump_write_attr(skb, extack->policy,
- NLMSGERR_ATTR_POLICY);
- if (extack->miss_type)
- WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_TYPE,
- extack->miss_type));
- if (extack->miss_nest &&
- !WARN_ON((u8 *)extack->miss_nest < in_skb->data ||
- (u8 *)extack->miss_nest > in_skb->data + in_skb->len))
- WARN_ON(nla_put_u32(skb, NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_NEST,
- (u8 *)extack->miss_nest - (u8 *)nlh));
-}
-
void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err,
const struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-20 2:35 [PATCH net-next 0/4] netdev: support dumping a single netdev in qstats Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-20 2:35 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-21 0:58 ` David Ahern
2024-04-21 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-04-21 19:32 ` David Ahern
2024-04-22 13:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-22 15:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-04-22 15:23 ` David Ahern
2024-04-20 2:35 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-04-21 0:59 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] netlink: move extack writing helpers David Ahern
2024-04-20 2:35 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] netlink: support all extack types in dumps Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-21 1:00 ` David Ahern
2024-04-20 2:35 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: drv-net: test dumping qstats per device Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] netdev: support dumping a single netdev in qstats patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240420023543.3300306-3-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).