From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:44:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424164405.GN42092@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi Aaron, Jakub, all,
I have recently been exercising the Open vSwitch kernel selftests,
using vng, something like this:
TESTDIR="tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch"
vng -v --run . --user root --cpus 2 \
--overlay-rwdir "$PWD" -- \
"modprobe openvswitch && \
echo \"timeout=90\" >> \"${TESTDIR}/settings\" && \
make -C \"$TESTDIR\" run_tests"
And I have some observations that I'd like to ask about.
1. Building the kernel using the following command does not
build the openvswitch kernel module.
vng -v --build \
--config tools/testing/selftests/net/config
All that seems to be missing is CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH=m
and I am wondering what the best way of resolving this is.
Perhaps I am doing something wrong.
Or perhaps tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/config
should be created? If so, should it include (most of?) what is in
tools/testing/selftests/net/config, or just CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH=m?
2. As per my example above, it seems that a modprobe openvswitch is
required (if openvswitch is a module).
Again, perhaps I am doing something wrong. But if not, should this be
incorporated into tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh
or otherwise automated?
3. I have observed that the last test fails (yesterday, but not today!),
because the namespace it tries to create already exists. I believe this
is because it is pending deletion.
My work-around is as follows:
ovs_add_netns_and_veths () {
info "Adding netns attached: sbx:$1 dp:$2 {$3, $4, $5}"
+ for i in $(seq 10); do
+ ovs_sbx "$1" test -e "/var/run/netns/$3" || break
+ info "Namespace $3 still exists (attempt $i)"
+ ovs_sbx "$1" ip netns del "$3"
+ sleep "$i"
+ done
ovs_sbx "$1" ip netns add "$3" || return 1
on_exit "ovs_sbx $1 ip netns del $3"
ovs_sbx "$1" ip link add "$4" type veth peer name "$5" || return 1
N.B.: the "netns del" part is probably not needed,
but I'm not able to exercise it effectively right now.
I am wondering if a loop like this is appropriate to add, perhaps also
to namespace deletion. Or if it would be appropriate to port
openvswitch.sh to use ./tools/testing/selftests/net/lib.sh, which I
believe handles this.
4. I am observing timeouts whith the default value of 45s.
Bumping this to 90s seems to help.
Are there any objections to a patch to bump the timeout?
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 16:44 Simon Horman [this message]
2024-04-24 17:37 ` [ovs-dev] selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements Simon Horman
2024-04-24 17:59 ` Benjamin Poirier
2024-04-24 18:14 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 7:33 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-24 18:14 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 7:40 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-25 20:00 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 0:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 8:26 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-25 18:57 ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-04-25 19:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 20:04 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-26 7:05 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-25 19:58 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424164405.GN42092@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).