From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: gaoxingwang <gaoxingwang1@huawei.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <yanan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: fix wrong start position when receive hop-by-hop fragment
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:51:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424195135.76d0f232@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422091917.3221601-1-gaoxingwang1@huawei.com>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:19:17 +0800 gaoxingwang wrote:
> In IPv6, ipv6_rcv_core will parse the hop-by-hop type extension header and increase skb->transport_header by one extension header length.
> But if there are more other extension headers like fragment header at this time, the skb->transport_header points to the second extension header,
> not the transport layer header or the first extension header.
>
> This will result in the start and nexthdrp variable not pointing to the same position in ipv6frag_thdr_trunced,
> and ipv6_skip_exthdr returning incorrect offset and frag_off.Sometimes,the length of the last sharded packet is smaller than the calculated incorrect offset, resulting in packet loss.
> We can use network header to offset and calculate the correct position to solve this problem.
>
> Fixes: 9d9e937b1c8b (ipv6/netfilter: Discard first fragment not including all headers)
nits:
- this is not correct format for Fixes, missing quotes
- please wrap the message at 72 chars
- please make sure you add spaces after punctuation
- please make sure you don't send new version of the patch in reply to
old, add a lore link to previous version under --- instead
About the code - how are you testing this?
What's the packet you're saying we drop?
If transport_header can't be trusted there may be more in this
function to fix..
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 1:10 [PATCH] net: ipv6: fix wrong start position when receive hop-by-hop fragment gaoxingwang
2024-04-22 9:19 ` [PATCH v2] " gaoxingwang
2024-04-25 2:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424195135.76d0f232@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gaoxingwang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yanan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).