netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: gaoxingwang <gaoxingwang1@huawei.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <yanan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: fix wrong start position when receive hop-by-hop fragment
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:51:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424195135.76d0f232@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422091917.3221601-1-gaoxingwang1@huawei.com>

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:19:17 +0800 gaoxingwang wrote:
> In IPv6, ipv6_rcv_core will parse the hop-by-hop type extension header and increase skb->transport_header by one extension header length.
> But if there are more other extension headers like fragment header at this time, the skb->transport_header points to the second extension header,
> not the transport layer header or the first extension header.
> 
> This will result in the start and nexthdrp variable not pointing to the same position in ipv6frag_thdr_trunced,
> and ipv6_skip_exthdr returning incorrect offset and frag_off.Sometimes,the length of the last sharded packet is smaller than the calculated incorrect offset, resulting in packet loss.
> We can use network header to offset and calculate the correct position to solve this problem.
> 
> Fixes: 9d9e937b1c8b (ipv6/netfilter: Discard first fragment not including all headers)

nits:
 - this is not correct format for Fixes, missing quotes
 - please wrap the message at 72 chars
 - please make sure you add spaces after punctuation
 - please make sure you don't send new version of the patch in reply to
   old, add a lore link to previous version under --- instead

About the code - how are you testing this?
What's the packet you're saying we drop?

If transport_header can't be trusted there may be more in this
function to fix..
-- 
pw-bot: cr

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22  1:10 [PATCH] net: ipv6: fix wrong start position when receive hop-by-hop fragment gaoxingwang
2024-04-22  9:19 ` [PATCH v2] " gaoxingwang
2024-04-25  2:51   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240424195135.76d0f232@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gaoxingwang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yanan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).