From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF05C1494BC; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714057036; cv=none; b=el0mm4IMxyACvVO1e14QaDCP90x91E1hWVGHZ3od08g2zi0j2xFEFQX9A1lgiUWr6mEwYiRvQtcUSQx4CEUP0mbrc8x6xktPk6GTsMvqMZW4S+MzN7YJX/kB9RZQibg51pjQ8rzBXt3vl0K+lRAC902AfevU1zNFxHPsMvrO7B4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714057036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C+itTDL3A8PImRFwW+2p6GQPM8DKabS7q7T2fAZamHM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i/doet/D29p/5iGs60yYNX4g2k/gNJLqmX004Z+ZqAahNN2e9Jrb5UwANUIWB4fL7Fmh2sXHq4eVoHw6TwbZTZOdXJllgNhFhWob8eD4i19/tKh2lQrjldNRaWfLHy9R07324O71k8ddiy3S5pGN4BZtUt+oumXcVni5mtAQ/G8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=dTuTsP+I; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="dTuTsP+I" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1A4DC000E; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:57:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1714057031; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mLXxiz1Ky5nDojL/VVZQzWe2VuDpGkCwUW5hLfQwjTQ=; b=dTuTsP+IJ5VW2lbM1ddRFj2We5xV5pmpubZYOL40eP5CzdUdw4HK5hI/TwjkkNGitqI+V7 EHOb4rX02VdKbmDDCzSRX1vu9J/lThB2MJ6N70EWe7YgWaaAEv405hgbnVa6wwCnwuxiTt GvhRuv8tcGdo0UgWKU2YH9VbpOWAhRQnTW6ENgMphNngVpxIaGXKVZgw7evXyYNY1WYuiV h6OPRKqksC7aSKUsrcHlDBh9GI0+dPtOt3txV1HaeyAdNf4XIdzNwrF+rcrOmx6fgRq3X0 P78gjr4+e+1X5wHYQaicz7vR4RECbCk06gHgHwtKf5oCSo0YhJHRp8wFj1+0SQ== Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:57:08 +0200 From: Kory Maincent To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Jiri Pirko , Oleksij Rempel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: pse-pd: Fixes for few small issues Message-ID: <20240425165708.62637485@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: <20240425074205.28677540@kernel.org> References: <20240423-fix_poe-v3-0-e50f32f5fa59@bootlin.com> <20240425103110.33c02857@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> <20240425070619.601d5e40@kernel.org> <20240425163002.5894c5e5@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> <20240425074205.28677540@kernel.org> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: kory.maincent@bootlin.com On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:42:05 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:30:02 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote: > > > Could you experiment with tweaking the posting? > > > Maybe we can "bisect" the problem. =20 > >=20 > > Do you want me to like post a v5 with the "pw-bot: cr" tag? But if I pu= t the > > tag only on the cover letter it won't work then. > > Maybe on all patches? =20 >=20 > Probably not worth posting for a test. I'll try to be more careful when > applying in the future, we can experiment with real postings. >=20 > > Was it the same for the PoE support patch series? =20 >=20 > Yeah, I had to apply that one manually. Does this patch series is on the same state? https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240422-feature_ptp_netnext-v11-0-f14441f2a= 1d8@bootlin.com/ Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com