From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29D845490E; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715310974; cv=none; b=Kc5hbsk+RnCXd67+5OMqWtv43WgqATWfa/FctjcilX4+cvzgb9UISht1F/huWblyXAmo2RQgeDGO8lXwMT5gKrRxApMCVeOkYOEswVc97BeQWysqjGWbCagat2qVsl011shgYeqCPn7Z71xoDXEnS2ZK2fFXv3EJtuIq9uV6Jgk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715310974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PytcuTsukT994oYXjr1HyDGo4xfMA1yb3JvQ6Ozqpgo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XBYdzXerp1a6DCbS5jwcQtuIf8xlTKY/KssswHxZg0J0sjpfb3pnP9KC6QOJel8YZ9ky+fMcg6Ok1+H4DOua5/F7MLr/jMBCzjnwdTSuO5PBOPerbgNuNN/sIs5OlvvR89aXrRWGQrQSeO00xCZWJ2HJEyEeLSK1pVNmXk6ZXHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=REVzbOSZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="REVzbOSZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFAD0C116B1; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715310973; bh=PytcuTsukT994oYXjr1HyDGo4xfMA1yb3JvQ6Ozqpgo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=REVzbOSZzKaiStzn9IuNaLnNHmDhtLkhb1jbOPPqxd1KRnh9C2STYomtY4Hw7DwI0 OwkxU8qCaAgKvGTBjm5tMQ/v5ANBf78n7FzA2o57Z7zG6jFOptQYmkJd7veBHIfMUo QtYiOTTbGQb3NAqH6gn9yE6XAphHbdfmrB35XoO3RcQBNSYwtDOF7LozvnpevmXxUu vJ8G60zechptAbwfl758Cl7YRBAk+zk4+GWhXKTdb5EI5NVdv3X2aYodVQWVcnWYAi qddA+g1p9JuD2art0a4ySlvIg8O5kjzveWXm7GxDiIA3Jj9rt0dJG8kRRh+x/+qBnY 5EreW0Tlm0vgA== Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:16:11 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ziwei Xiao Cc: Markus Elfring , Jeroen de Borst , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Harshitha Ramamurthy , Praveen Kaligineedi , Willem de Bruijn , LKML , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , John Fraker , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Shailend Chand , rushilg@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] gve: Add flow steering ethtool support Message-ID: <20240509201611.053027de@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240507225945.1408516-6-ziweixiao@google.com> <3e10ff86-902d-45ed-8671-6544ac4b3930@web.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 9 May 2024 17:19:00 -0700 Ziwei Xiao wrote: > > How do you think about to increase the application of scope-based resource management > > at such source code places? > > > Is the suggestion to combine dev_hold(netdev) together with > rtnl_unlock()? If so, I think there might be different usages for > using rtnl_unlock. For example, some drivers will call rtnl_unlock > after dev_close(netdev). Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you! We are rather cautious about adoption of the scope-based resource management in networking. Don't let Markus lead you astray.