From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A750149C4D; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715312588; cv=none; b=a6LfLu/KrxlsBK99DT8T9x7K2tjDLPFEjRXVkWF/EziuTBWvkTbd3Zfr3LHwF3ZKq3KUyc5tNx2I+eF0YSjQKQxo9EpQYgH8dU3ka9569YTjM4ELpMBH1IN2hr+LIqcOnjYMQUyqamcuzdb2M6VPfiE1wgp77MFzA9mlp/yzs4I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715312588; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IRI7ijMBENJeJbvWyeNQeNKWPmrdpYlkoms761MNs60=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g+EyYPqJAT4491L3ccDRdERDwnqCjtH2CiEBzadOvpWbsVvab6YRXnU/FSQ0lp5DlozWXe1eH9QSq12swxp2pS9gnnuF/DPYiLlVb5aS0gmg5upq4EvT6R7HcxkxYK4C4pbDXN6vaByMFul7aCbW1bTY7dHEzsrIc7KlJh6sApM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R8Gz1RUl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R8Gz1RUl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCDC7C113CC; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:43:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715312588; bh=IRI7ijMBENJeJbvWyeNQeNKWPmrdpYlkoms761MNs60=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R8Gz1RUl4VhP5EPAS9t58NVheClYuaRfeC+6xzWvNYEqR6PNPEGNt/0IP/TfBbvH6 1pbjVtS4hbPcRqoDsVp+byWcMdQ+YOG5IVvKT93tpBA/HMviAU2dfJJe8Owwn0e1iU bhXtFcvaxLaAg3eetVSH77GnGfjBXZdCbuiJKO2g+UBebTeZwrLaArBk3fyjysG8bO yYsai4nuHpSTLbKEpvwpYS24aOH3Gh+S9XWWI3neQ1QI1i2hvwflAx3kjLb54BKZ3f aMhn7Xl+PMo4dpax30DDpfyTHhJXBVhAjQmY4o2kr654GwpGV4L/dJFHnAzBMkPZkU q8TDdFLGc4/yg== Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:43:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , Woojung Huh , Arun Ramadoss , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, David Ahern , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , =?UTF-8?B?U8O4cmVu?= Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: rename IPV to IPM Message-ID: <20240509204306.1b4e77e5@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240509053335.129002-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> References: <20240509053335.129002-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20240509053335.129002-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 9 May 2024 07:33:33 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > IPV is added and used term in 802.1Qci PSFP and merged into 802.1Q (from > 802.1Q-2018) for another functions. >=20 > Even it does similar operation holding temporal priority value > internally (as it is named), because KSZ datasheet doesn't use the term > of IPV (Internal Priority Value) and avoiding any confusion later when > PSFP is in the Linux world, it is better to rename IPV to IPM (Internal > Priority Mapping). >=20 > In addition, LAN937x documentation already use IPV for 802.1Qci PSFP > related functionality. Transient build failure here: drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_dcb.c: In function =E2=80=98ksz_set_global_ds= cp_entry=E2=80=99: drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_dcb.c:323:25: error: =E2=80=98ipm=E2=80=99 un= declared (first use in this function); did you mean =E2=80=98ipv=E2=80=99? 323 | ipm << shift); | ^~~ | ipv --=20 pw-bot: cr