From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"Arun Ramadoss" <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
"David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Søren Andersen" <san@skov.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: rename IPV to IPM
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240510122829.GV2347895@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510053828.2412516-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 07:38:26AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> IPV is added and used term in 802.1Qci PSFP and merged into 802.1Q (from
> 802.1Q-2018) for another functions.
>
> Even it does similar operation holding temporal priority value
> internally (as it is named), because KSZ datasheet doesn't use the term
> of IPV (Internal Priority Value) and avoiding any confusion later when
> PSFP is in the Linux world, it is better to rename IPV to IPM (Internal
> Priority Mapping).
>
> In addition, LAN937x documentation already use IPV for 802.1Qci PSFP
> related functionality.
>
> Suggested-by: Woojung Huh <Woojung.Huh@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-10 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 5:38 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: dsa: microchip: DCB fixes Oleksij Rempel
2024-05-10 5:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: rename IPV to IPM Oleksij Rempel
2024-05-10 12:28 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-05-10 5:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: add comments for DSCP related functions Oleksij Rempel
2024-05-10 12:29 ` Simon Horman
2024-05-10 5:38 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: set default apptrust to PCP only Oleksij Rempel
2024-05-10 12:29 ` Simon Horman
2024-05-13 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: dsa: microchip: DCB fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240510122829.GV2347895@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=san@skov.dk \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).