From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97AEB2C853; Fri, 10 May 2024 12:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715344117; cv=none; b=VyefwZETBBlAiXBhZYcs+xtDEnvTJMMfj9pXixT2BPoiiO/d0rkx4euvgCkckzkCcBpBCDeZrUuJpWP5coNKxo/0U4mqHu7HiLHNuq3oFniiM9vpDB9+k5MSaK7TisKhOkfIpcMuVD6fAJ5B3Bi7k2LyygZ64e+BnussdoILKww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715344117; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wmvZz0LkD/8tTD1c8G+HvNR5R87lkoYDL7rtF5ljvxc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qIeKdIq0utYk1qVUGksT0XcLhWUByvYut/BIf0PDeQpxmXepAWZicH0MBa7sj3Ll4bSp1N/66DgrCxLokZtclg2jTiHJiw7u8kusBGg9IFQmwmVfZeCoX+un+67tVITLFKmRD/SetXYRyq2r88o2DBWCZ47NFhRi0OTOrhoykMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Yx3aRHRM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Yx3aRHRM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67193C113CC; Fri, 10 May 2024 12:28:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715344117; bh=wmvZz0LkD/8tTD1c8G+HvNR5R87lkoYDL7rtF5ljvxc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Yx3aRHRMm+IhSoduAs3qN3YVC2ugtmSPY/TBdn3CBrKR4rPuOkyav13QvHIgG3JnK eenaN4a9Svrnu0Oe6coi2mFgbnJTqWyIO+I00sEF4GGuYBLNwpSrXs6DVV2X1IAXd3 3hvCERoz5jLAq3n+oa50FcX6CGJHKABhy3BqpLiUQgADnlMFVIBy+EJCszn9o39e1w L3eGRXsaiZnIo4sEoGQJADdBkGyh7EB+TLJffjEsfoO5hHFL6NF4ZiC8E+znxsXLNZ 8KhG84TNwZFwlPwMtS0XuZh49s+KWmVipcOzEgI+OmCuCJqIsWDQPiueMr+kcrp0qd 0BUW/H1w3/Beg== Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:29 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , Woojung Huh , Arun Ramadoss , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, David Ahern , Willem de Bruijn , =?utf-8?B?U8O4cmVu?= Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: rename IPV to IPM Message-ID: <20240510122829.GV2347895@kernel.org> References: <20240510053828.2412516-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20240510053828.2412516-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240510053828.2412516-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 07:38:26AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > IPV is added and used term in 802.1Qci PSFP and merged into 802.1Q (from > 802.1Q-2018) for another functions. > > Even it does similar operation holding temporal priority value > internally (as it is named), because KSZ datasheet doesn't use the term > of IPV (Internal Priority Value) and avoiding any confusion later when > PSFP is in the Linux world, it is better to rename IPV to IPM (Internal > Priority Mapping). > > In addition, LAN937x documentation already use IPV for 802.1Qci PSFP > related functionality. > > Suggested-by: Woojung Huh > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > Reviewed-by: Woojung Huh Reviewed-by: Simon Horman