netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
	"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	mwojtas@chromium.org, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 09:30:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513093029.5df48163@device-28.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cedd632-d555-4c17-81cb-984af73f2c08@gmail.com>

Hi Heiner,

On Wed, 8 May 2024 07:44:22 +0200
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07.05.2024 12:28, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Having the net_device's init path for the link_topology depend on
> > IS_REACHABLE(PHYLIB)-protected helpers triggers errors when modules are being
> > built with phylib as a module as-well, as they expect netdev->link_topo
> > to be initialized.
> > 
> > Move the link_topo initialization at the first PHY insertion, which will
> > both improve the memory usage, and make the behaviour more predicatble
> > and robust.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> > Fixes: 6916e461e793 ("net: phy: Introduce ethernet link topology representation")
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2e11b89d-100f-49e7-9c9a-834cc0b82f97@gmail.com/
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240409201553.GA4124869@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c    | 31 ++++++---------------
> >  include/linux/netdevice.h              |  2 ++
> >  include/linux/phy_link_topology.h      | 23 ++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h | 23 +++-------------
> >  net/core/dev.c                         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c
> > index 0e36bd7c15dc..b1aba9313e73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c
> > @@ -12,29 +12,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> >  #include <linux/xarray.h>
> >  
> > -struct phy_link_topology *phy_link_topo_create(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > -	struct phy_link_topology *topo;
> > -
> > -	topo = kzalloc(sizeof(*topo), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!topo)
> > -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > -
> > -	xa_init_flags(&topo->phys, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
> > -	topo->next_phy_index = 1;
> > -
> > -	return topo;
> > -}
> > -
> > -void phy_link_topo_destroy(struct phy_link_topology *topo)
> > -{
> > -	if (!topo)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	xa_destroy(&topo->phys);
> > -	kfree(topo);
> > -}
> > -
> >  int phy_link_topo_add_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> >  			  struct phy_device *phy,
> >  			  enum phy_upstream upt, void *upstream)
> > @@ -43,6 +20,14 @@ int phy_link_topo_add_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> >  	struct phy_device_node *pdn;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	if (!topo) {
> > +		ret = netdev_alloc_phy_link_topology(dev);  
> 
> This function is implemented in net core, but used only here.
> So move the implementation here?

If it's OK not to have both helpers to alloc and destroy in different
files, then I'll move it :)

> 
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		topo = dev->link_topo;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	pdn = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdn), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!pdn)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > index cf261fb89d73..25a0a77cfadc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > @@ -4569,6 +4569,8 @@ void __hw_addr_unsync_dev(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list,
> >  					const unsigned char *));
> >  void __hw_addr_init(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *list);
> >  
> > +int netdev_alloc_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev);
> > +
> >  /* Functions used for device addresses handling */
> >  void dev_addr_mod(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int offset,
> >  		  const void *addr, size_t len);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/phy_link_topology.h b/include/linux/phy_link_topology.h
> > index 166a01710aa2..3501f9a9e932 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/phy_link_topology.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/phy_link_topology.h
> > @@ -32,10 +32,12 @@ struct phy_device_node {
> >  	struct phy_device *phy;
> >  };
> >  
> > -struct phy_link_topology {
> > -	struct xarray phys;
> > -	u32 next_phy_index;
> > -};
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB)
> > +int phy_link_topo_add_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> > +			  struct phy_device *phy,
> > +			  enum phy_upstream upt, void *upstream);
> > +
> > +void phy_link_topo_del_phy(struct net_device *dev, struct phy_device *phy);
> >  
> >  static inline struct phy_device
> >  *phy_link_topo_get_phy(struct net_device *dev, u32 phyindex)
> > @@ -53,13 +55,6 @@ static inline struct phy_device
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_PHYLIB)
> > -int phy_link_topo_add_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> > -			  struct phy_device *phy,
> > -			  enum phy_upstream upt, void *upstream);
> > -
> > -void phy_link_topo_del_phy(struct net_device *dev, struct phy_device *phy);
> > -
> >  #else
> >  static inline int phy_link_topo_add_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> >  					struct phy_device *phy,
> > @@ -72,6 +67,12 @@ static inline void phy_link_topo_del_phy(struct net_device *dev,
> >  					 struct phy_device *phy)
> >  {
> >  }
> > +
> > +static inline struct phy_device *
> > +phy_link_topo_get_phy(struct net_device *dev, u32 phyindex)
> > +{
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #endif /* __PHY_LINK_TOPOLOGY_H */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h b/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > index 0a6479055745..f9c0520806fb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
> > @@ -2,24 +2,9 @@
> >  #ifndef __PHY_LINK_TOPOLOGY_CORE_H
> >  #define __PHY_LINK_TOPOLOGY_CORE_H
> >  
> > -struct phy_link_topology;
> > -
> > -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_PHYLIB)
> > -
> > -struct phy_link_topology *phy_link_topo_create(struct net_device *dev);
> > -void phy_link_topo_destroy(struct phy_link_topology *topo);
> > -
> > -#else
> > -
> > -static inline struct phy_link_topology *phy_link_topo_create(struct net_device *dev)
> > -{
> > -	return NULL;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline void phy_link_topo_destroy(struct phy_link_topology *topo)
> > -{
> > -}
> > -
> > -#endif
> > +struct phy_link_topology {
> > +	struct xarray phys;
> > +	u32 next_phy_index;
> > +};
> >    
> This is all which is left in this header. As this header is public anyway,
> better move this definition to phy_link_topology.h?

Well I'll have to include the whole phy_link_topology.h in
net/core/dev.c, and I was trying to avoid including that whole header,
and keep the included content to a bare minimum.

> 
> >  #endif /* __PHY_LINK_TOPOLOGY_CORE_H */
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index d2ce91a334c1..1b4ffc273a04 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -10256,6 +10256,35 @@ static void netdev_do_free_pcpu_stats(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +int netdev_alloc_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct phy_link_topology *topo;
> > +
> > +	topo = kzalloc(sizeof(*topo), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!topo)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	xa_init_flags(&topo->phys, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
> > +	topo->next_phy_index = 1;
> > +
> > +	dev->link_topo = topo;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_alloc_phy_link_topology);
> > +
> > +static void netdev_free_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct phy_link_topology *topo = dev->link_topo;
> > +
> > +	if (!topo)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	xa_destroy(&topo->phys);
> > +	kfree(topo);
> > +	dev->link_topo = NULL;  
> 
> Give the compiler a chance to remove this function if
> CONFIG_PHYLIB isn't enabled.
> 
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB) && topo) {
> 	xa_destroy(&topo->phys);
> 	kfree(topo);
> 	dev->link_topo = NULL;
> }

Well if we add more things to the link topology, then it's going to be
easy to forget updating that without clear helpers for alloc/destroy,
don't you think ?

I can try to squeeze another iteration before net-next closes.

Maxime

> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * register_netdevice() - register a network device
> >   * @dev: device to register
> > @@ -10998,11 +11027,6 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
> >  	hash_init(dev->qdisc_hash);
> >  #endif
> > -	dev->link_topo = phy_link_topo_create(dev);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(dev->link_topo)) {
> > -		dev->link_topo = NULL;
> > -		goto free_all;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	dev->priv_flags = IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE | IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM;
> >  	setup(dev);
> > @@ -11092,7 +11116,9 @@ void free_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	free_percpu(dev->xdp_bulkq);
> >  	dev->xdp_bulkq = NULL;
> >  
> > -	phy_link_topo_destroy(dev->link_topo);
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB)
> > +	netdev_free_phy_link_topology(dev);
> > +#endif
> >    
> Then the conditional compiling can be removed here.
> 
> >  	/*  Compatibility with error handling in drivers */
> >  	if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED ||  
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 10:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Pass netdevice to phy_link_topo helpers Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-08  5:43   ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 23:08   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-08  5:44   ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-13  7:30     ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2024-05-13  8:07     ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13  8:15       ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13  6:36 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Nathan Chancellor
2024-05-13  9:15   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-13 15:11     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-14  6:46       ` Maxime Chevallier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240513093029.5df48163@device-28.home \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).