netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
	"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	mwojtas@chromium.org, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:07:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513100729.39713abb@device-28.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cedd632-d555-4c17-81cb-984af73f2c08@gmail.com>

Hello again Heiner,

On Wed, 8 May 2024 07:44:22 +0200
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07.05.2024 12:28, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Having the net_device's init path for the link_topology depend on
> > IS_REACHABLE(PHYLIB)-protected helpers triggers errors when modules are being
> > built with phylib as a module as-well, as they expect netdev->link_topo
> > to be initialized.
> > 
> > Move the link_topo initialization at the first PHY insertion, which will
> > both improve the memory usage, and make the behaviour more predicatble
> > and robust.

I agree with some of the comments, as stated in my previous mail,
however I'm struggling to find the time to fix, and re-test everything,
especially before net-next closes. Would it be OK if I re-send with a
fix for the kbuild bot warning, improve the commit log as you
mentionned for patch 1 so that at least the issue can be solved ?

I still have the netlink part of this work to send, so I definitely
will have to rework that, but with a bit less time constraints so that
I can properly re-test everything.

Best regards,

Maxime

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 10:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Pass netdevice to phy_link_topo helpers Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-08  5:43   ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 23:08   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-08  5:44   ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-13  7:30     ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13  8:07     ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2024-05-13  8:15       ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13  6:36 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Nathan Chancellor
2024-05-13  9:15   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-13 15:11     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-14  6:46       ` Maxime Chevallier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240513100729.39713abb@device-28.home \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).