From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9EDD537E7; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715626526; cv=none; b=JsF9Pc5nclT9/at2MBh0OCQpyJzSyQt4x8uCxc48fqjXDasPsNatVg2BVuesqiNS6UfaZiv7kZADpLY1/BQF4pDX3iJorg1neoHPEhs4XlajI4NDpx2WRfJ6q5UgpS0VbjXnfLOrskeC0e1Cg2J9yOMjupdObyHjTn7fXcLzrrk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715626526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GZV/Vfwlmaxtj4wAoHOeOIS1lpiVCIVCn9kJZPfG650=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pZevpvQ2KrA9aU27o0tIjmnbyIMHtyeuYyjtTnR4bP7j8PULZKCb49sapiPEfOBAwqeZ/fpunvDcxsr45fuy1eccJW7IJDrDvzTEax6aGEUCKNSCKTc6cXuGIGhpjF+4HT3g/2SUqHkOvCoRl5k2XrV5aiyBbJjYQ6L4bgcuq7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L2c5wLXQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L2c5wLXQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB248C113CC; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:55:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715626526; bh=GZV/Vfwlmaxtj4wAoHOeOIS1lpiVCIVCn9kJZPfG650=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L2c5wLXQcyT2Ddu0xxVsRugbQm2r19tFz29/0ox6iEp5r22M02s99LV/89p0SUhww yjvDvPtSCgK+ybmIR5aq0pCwnYi9PllDMBORgjfAXlOLh06nNG9RGLk8Vi20HOjX4X l8XnwSfAB5ECLkhW7/kW+BlhSYVaeiTd9ekwQI5Bwiidj+odvjJqAsDR7oYgEj5F+U kRyXRJEP/TaRoe+xa0wMMk6OmIIrHGu7B23iqvcMGmjfyN5ldcRrgL9wvTEWtcP3EI R11dVf519U/WBWoFfVAJjh5oVRFngSTcLpOB2qw3bq1Rqhi91L+1gtMaeJjWnj8jYi VSw6AMBq7sbGw== Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:55:25 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Joe Damato Cc: Tariq Toukan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, nalramli@fastly.com, Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Richard Cochran , "open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net/mlx5e: Add per queue netdev-genl stats Message-ID: <20240513115525.15043cfb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240510041705.96453-1-jdamato@fastly.com> <20240510041705.96453-2-jdamato@fastly.com> <20240513075827.66d42cc1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:46:57 -0700 Joe Damato wrote: > > FYI: I've also sent a v5 of the mlx4 patches which is only a very minor > > change from the v4 as suggested by Tariq (see the changelog in that cover > > letter). > > > > I am not trying to "rush" either in, to to speak, but if they both made it > > to 6.10 it would be great to have the same support on both drivers in the > > same kernel release :) > > Err, sorry, just going through emails now and saw that net-next was closed > just before I sent the v5. > > My apologies for missing that announcement. > > Do I need to re-send after net-next re-opens or will it automatically be in > the queue for net-next? Right, unless it somehow magically gets into our 6.10 PR - you'll most likely have to make a fresh posting after the merge window :)