From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: unregister root_lock_key in the error path of qdisc_alloc()
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 13:49:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405171311.SyRzzQjC-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516133035.1050113-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Hi Hou,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on v6.9]
[cannot apply to net/main net-next/main linus/master next-20240517]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hou-Tao/net-sched-unregister-root_lock_key-in-the-error-path-of-qdisc_alloc/20240516-213538
base: v6.9
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240516133035.1050113-1-houtao%40huaweicloud.com
patch subject: [PATCH] net/sched: unregister root_lock_key in the error path of qdisc_alloc()
config: openrisc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405171311.SyRzzQjC-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405171311.SyRzzQjC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405171311.SyRzzQjC-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/sched/sch_generic.c: In function 'qdisc_alloc':
>> net/sched/sch_generic.c:983:36: error: 'struct Qdisc' has no member named 'root_lock_key'
983 | lockdep_unregister_key(&sch->root_lock_key);
| ^~
vim +983 net/sched/sch_generic.c
924
925 struct Qdisc *qdisc_alloc(struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
926 const struct Qdisc_ops *ops,
927 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
928 {
929 struct Qdisc *sch;
930 unsigned int size = sizeof(*sch) + ops->priv_size;
931 int err = -ENOBUFS;
932 struct net_device *dev;
933
934 if (!dev_queue) {
935 NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No device queue given");
936 err = -EINVAL;
937 goto errout;
938 }
939
940 dev = dev_queue->dev;
941 sch = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, netdev_queue_numa_node_read(dev_queue));
942
943 if (!sch)
944 goto errout;
945 __skb_queue_head_init(&sch->gso_skb);
946 __skb_queue_head_init(&sch->skb_bad_txq);
947 gnet_stats_basic_sync_init(&sch->bstats);
948 spin_lock_init(&sch->q.lock);
949
950 if (ops->static_flags & TCQ_F_CPUSTATS) {
951 sch->cpu_bstats =
952 netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct gnet_stats_basic_sync);
953 if (!sch->cpu_bstats)
954 goto errout1;
955
956 sch->cpu_qstats = alloc_percpu(struct gnet_stats_queue);
957 if (!sch->cpu_qstats) {
958 free_percpu(sch->cpu_bstats);
959 goto errout1;
960 }
961 }
962
963 spin_lock_init(&sch->busylock);
964 lockdep_set_class(&sch->busylock,
965 dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock);
966
967 /* seqlock has the same scope of busylock, for NOLOCK qdisc */
968 spin_lock_init(&sch->seqlock);
969 lockdep_set_class(&sch->seqlock,
970 dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock);
971
972 sch->ops = ops;
973 sch->flags = ops->static_flags;
974 sch->enqueue = ops->enqueue;
975 sch->dequeue = ops->dequeue;
976 sch->dev_queue = dev_queue;
977 sch->owner = -1;
978 netdev_hold(dev, &sch->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
979 refcount_set(&sch->refcnt, 1);
980
981 return sch;
982 errout1:
> 983 lockdep_unregister_key(&sch->root_lock_key);
984 kfree(sch);
985 errout:
986 return ERR_PTR(err);
987 }
988
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 13:30 [PATCH] net/sched: unregister root_lock_key in the error path of qdisc_alloc() Hou Tao
2024-05-16 13:33 ` Hou Tao
2024-05-16 13:45 ` Davide Caratti
2024-05-17 1:17 ` Hou Tao
2024-05-17 5:49 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-05-17 6:20 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405171311.SyRzzQjC-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).