From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9257F7C8 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716300486; cv=none; b=Gn23riOf1C00IGwG5k66Ct8KE1L1LVOSi2yRaLwTRnlKo6ghRiH/rzuqWno+cnTOG9uMds5UDRIfyvcAYyBAbnUco1WobqLrF64H3mXLuYl8141uYb6LHIoAU2/b4iAE1xZiZ2A4kU4JPU4TIGwqDz3XVTdMU3bTx228vhCG0R8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716300486; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rKYukvrI5TbGiEI6itS2BS5Fa/jpJmyU1H2tO7zeKd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hPGUH6kpb1h0VL8oNl71TsBsDU8T5IbESRwyWpetsLQHy9qfYD5tyn40DZpTngmDPcYuk/h2S6/qfhsVAFBJdi70ILwGYCcY9+JzF0ilfOyLjrW+crcvQb3DFM9ra3+6G/83RHFS8t9Re3Wgh/H+sqd0Jt1zTAERjW+YZ0o49Ak= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ngBK63Z3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ngBK63Z3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFD99C32786; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:08:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1716300485; bh=rKYukvrI5TbGiEI6itS2BS5Fa/jpJmyU1H2tO7zeKd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ngBK63Z3Ail2UgiJU3h+fvXxDm20KzVjjj/PTMgBAcqUykNv6IMP74oGVznicnry+ 2SoKUtci3kApVsD81ryE6Ap9EvfFyWyHZPIHPTnbCF9NynI0B804yoaXKj0zUnMaR0 t4EC18c9rqb4Age+CKalYi3NmsFvg7L/i96I4R4y5/5c74pYdGTAaQlHa/BcN5HOBP 5PXnkIVv5F1+zzyosWIlp87gbSw6wD55a8IbbpQ85660AROvY3xXpaxEAE31HBQ60d mCGKf2YTaiK9SafuqSN1It6Li2669UEwf3B6LivuXAtry7XXsRA4vA/Do+ksldpzpN HdKncLk4qaNqg== Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:06:31 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Shannon Nelson Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, brett.creeley@amd.com, drivers@pensando.io Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10 Message-ID: <20240521140631.GF764145@kernel.org> References: <20240521013715.12098-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240521013715.12098-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 06:37:08PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote: > These are a few minor fixes for the ionic driver to clean > up a some little things that have been waiting for attention. > > Brett Creeley (3): > ionic: Pass ionic_txq_desc to ionic_tx_tso_post > ionic: Mark error paths in the data path as unlikely > ionic: Use netdev_name() function instead of netdev->name > > Shannon Nelson (4): > ionic: fix potential irq name truncation > ionic: Reset LIF device while restarting LIF > ionic: only sync frag_len in first buffer of xdp > ionic: fix up ionic_if.h kernel-doc issues Hi Shannon and Brett, All of these patches look like good improvements to me. However, it is only obvious to me why patch 2/7 is a bug fix suitable for net. Would the other patches be better targeted at net-next once it reopens?