From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99401F17B for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 17:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716397446; cv=none; b=D+weekUZHwFHyCAG5+P0Dn6UeLIuwYM6IoLVgQgD8zp2uHOajjHEo/7zdfXrfDh3sXXFP805Lc8KE+YKwc1I9bPnjU1izFmgxxH7hYWe0OeIsfcYrk/ENVAWjPtRIBVN8MBWJjuEEEYkbOjFCB7KfLCqPdv97I2af72tY4f9wBI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716397446; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fdUPH0V1XmDR09nXntX63sgvijubm8iHgJvlx4MPcvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YpJWje6iAyosxw5hRTvuBwPbuMCXt2M01HBNjNIAFZhIyCljH/kFEfKR6dmusXVvDrNg2QbYvMzT7JeteJwldrJSQdk5YfAR83o0f7UM7yIKk5wu3IVmBvsmsSWLdGikiq4avdykSOz4IXGMJwf+tUw+Ub8yEK9F6+1EAJ2XF+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=l74wTZv0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="l74wTZv0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F4052C2BBFC; Wed, 22 May 2024 17:04:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1716397446; bh=fdUPH0V1XmDR09nXntX63sgvijubm8iHgJvlx4MPcvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l74wTZv0ur2Gl1zcENGNn9EU7D9/87isq2uesaqmN4E4yLfQ+06dDKkyHlG2tTb4N uYH+8XN9NMTeKp05HpxgG9MMdBXLzYZWeeeYKA+9nYpKRugG9CQ6/YNln49c5eRW/l i567Sl72j2IxTWWyagU8PZ+7V7YmOUdsaHTc93pGtuNC3EQd+gWZRFKeZ4NMmopBLe HNSXPzE4xmJhPacC33iyDxoPCHw4fSB+W1zosi0aVvdLqAPUz+my+Bct3aFJUXqIqF PiNYgfo8CwCXSN4Y3CTzhTHS8TrIuT/ck60lvZEF33iCtAhbsQ463viVrb+3faVExe xYomomSGCy8iA== Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:04:04 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Nelson, Shannon" Cc: Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, brett.creeley@amd.com, drivers@pensando.io Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10 Message-ID: <20240522100404.230e4bab@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240521013715.12098-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com> <20240521140631.GF764145@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:14:24 -0700 Nelson, Shannon wrote: > As always, thanks for taking a look at the set. > > All of these patches are fixing existing code, whether by cleaning up > compiler warnings (1, 7), tweaking for slightly better code (3, 4), > getting rid of open coding instances (5), and fixing bad behavior (2,6). > It seems to me these fit under the "fixes to existing code" mentioned > in our Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst guidelines. I think that's a stretch, Simon is right. Maybe we can take patches 1 and 7 without the Fixes tag, just to make your life easier. But if the rest are fixes I wouldn't know what isn't..