From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630AD13C8FF; Thu, 23 May 2024 11:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716464377; cv=none; b=IGFYMlQa9mb86VR1d/boQcocNhytiVG18OBDEJAMB6zLtOV6FX2fDeNhUyEJYNmwKKnJ9hnAhF7Mz8lEU4atzVoSF8jSJAFlgmF4IFHdeo+pzJxuVnlqwGR1Mm5cV0+vBYvlvbjovH7ZoxJY9bB8oCPNHSB5DMZhcyw29Gv7mBc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716464377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w8jWi4je3moYWW+1PYvpd/udmlXfbZl7Sd4Y1C15ytQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k843cHp+vxm0Nm1PrUxCQ3EBLpU9GFL82rQ9pAjgIqMUAJiag8S0MW2lDxBGToxZoOb01GKOtBQt6YJpQn16NlyOTHhNQC+Mrk3QnQb5OkQ1Im5ARZFlqFt3ppM2GHpMgIUgD7HIIKQKi1Arx+v3kHeM4GIhy4h6gpcQBdG8f08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=afHhOJku; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="afHhOJku" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BC9AC2BD10; Thu, 23 May 2024 11:39:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1716464376; bh=w8jWi4je3moYWW+1PYvpd/udmlXfbZl7Sd4Y1C15ytQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=afHhOJkuYLsVxCYBTtHV3QORq9M6VymtysX0aI3oGjhH+DDXgI3uNQwJbJDUs0j0i kXOOju9Ebt3TnPwFu7HQ1ekanI44kUifR+NxJbCLh4o1tl5ecLcRMG/HadQXe4eV2r wY4rxjpAYPuFUH2bMlFFhuWJ0OPL1Pnz8VORbEGE= Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:39:34 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Zhengchao Shao Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix CVE-2024-26865 Message-ID: <2024052305-almanac-reseal-9f91@gregkh> References: <20240506030554.3168143-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240506030554.3168143-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote: > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable > is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch. But right now, there is no "pernet" variable in the tree. I'm confused, what are you trying to do here by reverting these two commits? Why are reverts required? greg k-h