From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF91BBA2F; Thu, 23 May 2024 11:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716464062; cv=none; b=uJrURL4VyzmNXCD+B4fEjiYY9IlxyOIr9bbFXgWecHo93pC8cDhZk8vaJRd0B5S9v6LLXxzlc8N614+ZIDBMb6YLlkyepXgIb1SKOWA5kqVz+AfntsmZdnG7L+OeYuXBbl2XxY97PqSP5LCJb1P7qafyNmFfLLY1MksswI4AuYw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716464062; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x/F9LRjG86L3igI7XUfcG8NAtYjBAyxlWrjUdapL0ck=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ImVzH5xAqDhYoNRA1f9xyfRXSUCYnA+E8t7PERliOPXVu2e4J9NB72hHmjQLXj355lOEfPHKCwT3AY8MpJtENM7kb354Zdc98GMqM/iG2ot5sbbDUyepBZTzabmD7a9GFYFQSSCS59p81N4tHxOumSn4FRGNFTMAeDq8R22PphY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=pyEp80TW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="pyEp80TW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E556AC2BD10; Thu, 23 May 2024 11:34:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1716464062; bh=x/F9LRjG86L3igI7XUfcG8NAtYjBAyxlWrjUdapL0ck=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pyEp80TWjGEXXzsl7LKL/sF7j4OiR8gs1hAuVpOqVjVeuTO4/kp4xmDeSQApKv1bx JYyfLyKfBA2rhv7AwyvxpxJvf2Vg1V4Hmf/qkLLVInDU2kKts6PZhqz8WHu9UN2gdW lM6mqSGXN7vTkfGjL6Qbr7JP2p+1wzRrqRSL29qI= Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:34:19 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Zhengchao Shao Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix CVE-2024-26865 Message-ID: <2024052355-doze-implicate-236d@gregkh> References: <20240506030554.3168143-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240506030554.3168143-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote: > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable > is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch. I do not understand, why are these reverts needed? How does the code currently build if there is no variable here? confused, greg k-h