From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC34D23748; Sat, 25 May 2024 09:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716630159; cv=none; b=PshV3MAgOhJByqbs6laMAnBymC7xAFGabyobXsCCChUntyZBmIKHCsovThreMRBatbJdaPXYNbJSKO7e4HHqj0OOvjbiUfbd0OO/m/zOQMKnRCPnPaQ24X1vJ+sK0dzUbU2y4ID0avqkUe2T4oJ3DLuBZf4VZjJYIrUpeuZSHIs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716630159; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RiSBNerJeUUysE1tNmEwQ7JhpvQEcx5D1JY07vm8CDk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q0IGa6JaEkL2hC23v/MCdowFz4d7rVZAoKlvEeUl9Ulch49FUCtTPsQi83Xw3/q7VYTle/5Qdl7v8KaqPspkn8UdzOzgsoGqJ3gkzN+3G7t7do3Wp+L9qwp0rRQ/g55qAvIGO/OOjekj/nFliMmKoLFwwKbtOj6zN0nSKNC+V7k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=yMAdpl81; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="yMAdpl81" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6B53C2BD11; Sat, 25 May 2024 09:42:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1716630158; bh=RiSBNerJeUUysE1tNmEwQ7JhpvQEcx5D1JY07vm8CDk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yMAdpl81sfNgGy7j+B0YCqpyYdzYRX4+s42aHXoFFYdBwh9fTsRq1DqKyKgVhgL7r AcTJTF5SXYmx8JnVz6q8RYOfiedQQkUPPxomKqF7i0udoHJfoe3yVIphKqSYWgXJiJ 8kGhjIOoPpROt8jhL7B6UB9hfEqNIsKEakGA9icg= Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 11:42:40 +0200 From: Greg KH To: shaozhengchao Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH stable,5.15 0/2] Revert the patchset for fix CVE-2024-26865 Message-ID: <2024052511-aflutter-outsider-4917@gregkh> References: <20240506030554.3168143-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> <2024052355-doze-implicate-236d@gregkh> <92bc4c96-9aaa-056c-e59a-4396d19a9f58@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92bc4c96-9aaa-056c-e59a-4396d19a9f58@huawei.com> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 05:33:00PM +0800, shaozhengchao wrote: > > > On 2024/5/23 19:34, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote: > > > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable > > > is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch. > > > > I do not understand, why are these reverts needed? > > > > How does the code currently build if there is no variable here? > > > > confused, > > > > greg k-h > Hi greg: > If only the first patch is merged, compilation will fail. > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. But both patches are merged together here. Does the released kernel versions fail to build somehow? thanks, greg k-h