From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
wintera@linux.ibm.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 19:12:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240529111200.GJ78725@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1716955147-88923-4-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2024-05-29 11:59:07, D. Wythe wrote:
>From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>
>This patch allows to create smc socket via AF_INET,
>similar to the following code,
>
>/* create v4 smc sock */
>v4 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SMC);
>
>/* create v6 smc sock */
>v6 = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SMC);
>
>There are several reasons why we believe it is appropriate here:
>
>1. For smc sockets, it actually use IPv4 (AF-INET) or IPv6 (AF-INET6)
>address. There is no AF_SMC address at all.
>
>2. Create smc socket in the AF_INET(6) path, which allows us to reuse
>the infrastructure of AF_INET(6) path, such as common ebpf hooks.
>Otherwise, smc have to implement it again in AF_SMC path.
>
>Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>---
> include/uapi/linux/in.h | 2 +
> net/smc/Makefile | 2 +-
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++
> net/smc/inet_smc.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/smc/inet_smc.h | 34 +++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 net/smc/inet_smc.c
> create mode 100644 net/smc/inet_smc.h
>
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/in.h b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
>index e682ab6..0c6322b 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/in.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
>@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum {
> #define IPPROTO_RAW IPPROTO_RAW
> IPPROTO_MPTCP = 262, /* Multipath TCP connection */
> #define IPPROTO_MPTCP IPPROTO_MPTCP
>+ IPPROTO_SMC = 263, /* Shared Memory Communications */
>+#define IPPROTO_SMC IPPROTO_SMC
> IPPROTO_MAX
> };
> #endif
>diff --git a/net/smc/Makefile b/net/smc/Makefile
>index 2c510d54..472b9ee 100644
>--- a/net/smc/Makefile
>+++ b/net/smc/Makefile
>@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMC) += smc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMC_DIAG) += smc_diag.o
> smc-y := af_smc.o smc_pnet.o smc_ib.o smc_clc.o smc_core.o smc_wr.o smc_llc.o
> smc-y += smc_cdc.o smc_tx.o smc_rx.o smc_close.o smc_ism.o smc_netlink.o smc_stats.o
>-smc-y += smc_tracepoint.o
>+smc-y += smc_tracepoint.o inet_smc.o
> smc-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += smc_sysctl.o
> smc-$(CONFIG_SMC_LO) += smc_loopback.o
>diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>index 8e3ce76..320624c 100644
>--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
>+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> #include "smc_tracepoint.h"
> #include "smc_sysctl.h"
> #include "smc_loopback.h"
>+#include "inet_smc.h"
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_server_lgr_pending); /* serialize link group
> * creation on server
>@@ -3594,9 +3595,31 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
> goto out_lo;
> }
>
>+ rc = proto_register(&smc_inet_prot, 1);
>+ if (rc) {
>+ pr_err("%s: proto_register smc_inet_prot fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
>+ goto out_ulp;
>+ }
>+ inet_register_protosw(&smc_inet_protosw);
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+ rc = proto_register(&smc_inet6_prot, 1);
>+ if (rc) {
>+ pr_err("%s: proto_register smc_inet6_prot fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
>+ goto out_inet_prot;
>+ }
>+ inet6_register_protosw(&smc_inet6_protosw);
>+#endif
>+
What do you think of moving all those inet initialization code into
something like smc_inet_init() and move it to smc_inet.c ?
> static_branch_enable(&tcp_have_smc);
> return 0;
>
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+out_inet_prot:
>+ inet_unregister_protosw(&smc_inet_protosw);
>+ proto_unregister(&smc_inet_prot);
>+#endif
>+out_ulp:
>+ tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops);
> out_lo:
> smc_loopback_exit();
> out_ib:
>@@ -3633,6 +3656,10 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
> static void __exit smc_exit(void)
> {
> static_branch_disable(&tcp_have_smc);
>+ inet_unregister_protosw(&smc_inet_protosw);
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+ inet6_unregister_protosw(&smc_inet6_protosw);
>+#endif
> tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops);
> sock_unregister(PF_SMC);
> smc_core_exit();
>@@ -3644,6 +3671,10 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void)
> destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq);
> proto_unregister(&smc_proto6);
> proto_unregister(&smc_proto);
>+ proto_unregister(&smc_inet_prot);
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+ proto_unregister(&smc_inet6_prot);
>+#endif
> smc_pnet_exit();
> smc_nl_exit();
> smc_clc_exit();
>@@ -3660,4 +3691,9 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void)
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_ALIAS_NETPROTO(PF_SMC);
> MODULE_ALIAS_TCP_ULP("smc");
>+/* 263 for IPPROTO_SMC and 1 for SOCK_STREAM */
>+MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE(PF_INET, 263, 1);
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE(PF_INET6, 263, 1);
>+#endif
> MODULE_ALIAS_GENL_FAMILY(SMC_GENL_FAMILY_NAME);
>diff --git a/net/smc/inet_smc.c b/net/smc/inet_smc.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 00000000..1ba73d7
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/net/smc/inet_smc.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
>+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>+/*
>+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
>+ *
>+ * Definitions for the IPPROTO_SMC (socket related)
>+ *
>+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016, 2018
>+ * Copyright (c) 2024, Alibaba Inc.
>+ *
>+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>+ */
>+
>+#include "inet_smc.h"
>+#include "smc.h"
>+
>+struct proto smc_inet_prot = {
>+ .name = "INET_SMC",
>+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+ .init = smc_inet_init_sock,
>+ .hash = smc_hash_sk,
>+ .unhash = smc_unhash_sk,
>+ .release_cb = smc_release_cb,
>+ .obj_size = sizeof(struct smc_sock),
>+ .h.smc_hash = &smc_v4_hashinfo,
>+ .slab_flags = SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU,
>+};
>+
>+const struct proto_ops smc_inet_stream_ops = {
>+ .family = PF_INET,
>+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+ .release = smc_release,
>+ .bind = smc_bind,
>+ .connect = smc_connect,
>+ .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
>+ .accept = smc_accept,
>+ .getname = smc_getname,
>+ .poll = smc_poll,
>+ .ioctl = smc_ioctl,
>+ .listen = smc_listen,
>+ .shutdown = smc_shutdown,
>+ .setsockopt = smc_setsockopt,
>+ .getsockopt = smc_getsockopt,
>+ .sendmsg = smc_sendmsg,
>+ .recvmsg = smc_recvmsg,
>+ .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
>+ .splice_read = smc_splice_read,
>+};
>+
>+struct inet_protosw smc_inet_protosw = {
>+ .type = SOCK_STREAM,
>+ .protocol = IPPROTO_SMC,
>+ .prot = &smc_inet_prot,
>+ .ops = &smc_inet_stream_ops,
>+ .flags = INET_PROTOSW_ICSK,
>+};
>+
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+struct proto smc_inet6_prot = {
>+ .name = "INET6_SMC",
>+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+ .init = smc_inet_init_sock,
>+ .hash = smc_hash_sk,
>+ .unhash = smc_unhash_sk,
>+ .release_cb = smc_release_cb,
>+ .obj_size = sizeof(struct smc_sock),
>+ .h.smc_hash = &smc_v6_hashinfo,
>+ .slab_flags = SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU,
>+};
>+
>+const struct proto_ops smc_inet6_stream_ops = {
>+ .family = PF_INET6,
>+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+ .release = smc_release,
>+ .bind = smc_bind,
>+ .connect = smc_connect,
>+ .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
>+ .accept = smc_accept,
>+ .getname = smc_getname,
>+ .poll = smc_poll,
>+ .ioctl = smc_ioctl,
>+ .listen = smc_listen,
>+ .shutdown = smc_shutdown,
>+ .setsockopt = smc_setsockopt,
>+ .getsockopt = smc_getsockopt,
>+ .sendmsg = smc_sendmsg,
>+ .recvmsg = smc_recvmsg,
>+ .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
>+ .splice_read = smc_splice_read,
>+};
>+
>+struct inet_protosw smc_inet6_protosw = {
>+ .type = SOCK_STREAM,
>+ .protocol = IPPROTO_SMC,
>+ .prot = &smc_inet6_prot,
>+ .ops = &smc_inet6_stream_ops,
>+ .flags = INET_PROTOSW_ICSK,
>+};
>+#endif
>+
>+int smc_inet_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
>+{
>+ struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>+
>+ /* init common smc sock */
>+ smc_sk_init(net, sk, IPPROTO_SMC);
>+ /* create clcsock */
>+ return smc_create_clcsk(net, sk, sk->sk_family);
>+}
>diff --git a/net/smc/inet_smc.h b/net/smc/inet_smc.h
>new file mode 100644
>index 00000000..c55345d
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/net/smc/inet_smc.h
>@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>+/*
>+ * Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) and RoCE
>+ *
>+ * Definitions for the IPPROTO_SMC (socket related)
>+
>+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
>+ * Copyright (c) 2024, Alibaba Inc.
>+ *
>+ * Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>+ */
>+#ifndef __INET_SMC
>+#define __INET_SMC
>+
>+#include <net/protocol.h>
>+#include <net/sock.h>
>+#include <net/tcp.h>
Why not put those 'include's in the .c file ?
>+
>+extern struct proto smc_inet_prot;
>+extern const struct proto_ops smc_inet_stream_ops;
>+extern struct inet_protosw smc_inet_protosw;
>+
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>+#include <net/ipv6.h>
>+/* MUST after net/tcp.h or warning */
>+#include <net/transp_v6.h>
>+extern struct proto smc_inet6_prot;
>+extern const struct proto_ops smc_inet6_stream_ops;
>+extern struct inet_protosw smc_inet6_protosw;
>+#endif
>+
>+int smc_inet_init_sock(struct sock *sk);
Seems smc_inet_init_sock() is only used in smc_inet.c,
why not defined it as a static function ?
Best regards,
Dust
>+
>+#endif /* __INET_SMC */
>--
>1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 3:59 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Introduce IPPROTO_SMC D. Wythe
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/smc: refactoring initialization of smc sock D. Wythe
2024-05-29 6:14 ` Tony Lu
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net/smc: expose smc proto operations D. Wythe
2024-05-29 17:57 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-30 2:33 ` D. Wythe
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC D. Wythe
2024-05-29 11:12 ` Dust Li [this message]
2024-05-30 3:11 ` D. Wythe
2024-05-29 11:58 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-05-30 2:51 ` D. Wythe
2024-05-29 19:55 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-30 2:35 ` D. Wythe
2024-06-01 13:06 ` Simon Horman
2024-06-03 2:57 ` D. Wythe
2024-06-03 7:47 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240529111200.GJ78725@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).