From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5FAD7F; Thu, 30 May 2024 00:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717027855; cv=none; b=rAAF3elWRg6aW8qcMP80m7j+Hqvh8IZG4x3N+zCKwALBfDAHNGV7qltVOUR2ajhtOLTNv7QMwtlhHSvfrjxGWt+DwTcnqQXoa20OZhsPSNXNVWNTm8gShkjWF4n3/Opxf5CNGLidlC+D9kP3fmWBb4Xsx8sltD4Jzw1KML+P2+4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717027855; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n5cHmceXcDfDX/c/RyY/vgiIjInJNHRy6l4phJMpOLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gm0PXqc8OeC5Dl/qgQqVwh5o68sFwux+T6fo2th4RPThz03PXL+Tu837uFSoNkHn23PXhloss0QrF8P2Y79Jh8q5BzkvotfEebKYMyJHlJsAXA8CEIWJHfmi7JxmSmU5uXZBeoYqvKns/3LacKo233M4EhWAqrF92BrZPf9blEc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z6CG6jw4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z6CG6jw4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92946C113CC; Thu, 30 May 2024 00:10:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717027855; bh=n5cHmceXcDfDX/c/RyY/vgiIjInJNHRy6l4phJMpOLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z6CG6jw4X82EENcgvPVxutM4JCLbW/gdxI9KsAkYLozWNIvF8IyP7jL+hOaea6OOm EWkXG3T8hWew/WwAoRPp57iSYJMXb9eBY8phWVcGhUInLeoEwzkpetU4ppsZJQ9wvq 21wo8SS0AkKrtU69djkPxAMX2hkBTm6sFs2nFl8lPICk8D3F3awj/yknpwkBW+Fi+u aHqCb9hYnivK30diZDPOr9fbI2o/xEXLzS/oh4FQKaKpoYDNXjm0bSf4NSZ9R/D4O6 53zGneU04Sz6XWUDAnWubGGNxl8QEIKT+PQNsuDUr7CRFRu3DUoDu2EO5uc83rNdHa 2iXFvWuABdJcQ== Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 17:10:53 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Heng Qi Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?UTF-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jiri Pirko , Daniel Jurgens Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] virtio_net: rename ret to err Message-ID: <20240529171053.132ae776@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240528075226.94255-2-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20240528075226.94255-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> <20240528075226.94255-2-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 28 May 2024 15:52:25 +0800 Heng Qi wrote: > The integer variable 'ret', denoting the return code, is mismatched with > the boolean return type of virtnet_send_command_reply(); hence, it is > renamed to 'err'. > > The usage of 'ret' is deferred to the next patch. That seems a bit much. Can you call the variable in patch 2 "ok" instead? -- pw-bot: cr