From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA6E14F62; Thu, 30 May 2024 00:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717028262; cv=none; b=V2h+iVPvxKYDwzdzYRRa8nkCvfvFOOrQfOzdx0zQLcsznrXVunRWAV+QukrYeZtM+O3eZTwpVjiW9B3WlPNDjAWOHdeaBo/ocCUoZzqwcdwpds06+2DB7x73DzNJUajMYd5PiVB56o0Wt+wSnNGSqOzIWS9OOKP5X0n0Kh4grxg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717028262; c=relaxed/simple; bh=djdHd8wIHONCymWta1CjqNGNBC7+yFbgjGcWEkWGUHg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OpIXUOilBiQZgA0l9eWIcSACzIPcapJ1wNA+CR1gB0B8tGrZUge+I45gxZ239+1WjbxbDLsBLcKw6VtMtIaRNXbBfRcLKQveVLQDLg6NR43XTQMlfAlEM0yE0PHZSuxHLOTASiGLf66hkVyJAw5SjJVV9qhMMW+Jo7Cm8YFFkx4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C7/bhxbh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C7/bhxbh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD523C113CC; Thu, 30 May 2024 00:17:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717028262; bh=djdHd8wIHONCymWta1CjqNGNBC7+yFbgjGcWEkWGUHg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C7/bhxbhCQ2f9sVQXyL58m7qdJhdR83K6vwFSyAUYKSZg8+cp36I01HifiNaqHV0r 2zgIpDY7J0QlBS9QXIqmQvmUVPnR8JVoyIbNSQr0HFva5moTIikCr4qFH1BxCX47iz I4+ES8Ex9CTiD9utjC9srvXjvATl7/g4jRH0nN/NjkH9CXNFdj7H18C1P3JPVMqpPg Xk0uLhHSCdppObIX0jDkIRSWZiI20dyzNMbII2MFuz6Cf4FV4cpLO51LZOaIA3xbOT hefSAPPX+3X04hisxm1YZ9d4WX6bhlYbjWETU3fqQKLugVSDIKnLPoRnuBRa0yky/7 hznkxY928MTxw== Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 17:17:40 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Thorsten Blum Cc: Nicolas Pitre , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Breno Leitao , Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xl?= =?UTF-8?B?aW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= , Andrew Lunn , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: smc91x: Refactor SMC_* macros Message-ID: <20240529171740.0643a5a1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240528104421.399885-3-thorsten.blum@toblux.com> References: <20240528104421.399885-3-thorsten.blum@toblux.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 28 May 2024 12:44:23 +0200 Thorsten Blum wrote: > Use the macro parameter lp directly instead of relying on ioaddr being > defined in the surrounding scope. Have you tested this, or just compile tested (please mention what testing has been done in the commit message in the future)? What's the motivation - cleanup or this helps remove some warnings? (again, please mention in the commit message) AFAICT this will break smc_probe(). -- pw-bot: cr