From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F6E7CF25 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717179323; cv=none; b=fRb5P5C81eDivvfwk7tJlB1lxEYIDkwDK9VK0Vw+2pHLyJw+Zc8GrlPyyWbXmQ+7D+8YYlLXU8VKo8VJZYiXmREvhRDXedHdvHMMmo9kvwhxKpxk1AGnbxgMiBjV3qyXi0we83bW8ZKqxWz6KeVtcWwgMLAyb7Znmx+tn9qF82w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717179323; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wqf/4nMRINsqR/TmXLZx/sDAoqGQhcSMG3F2Th/6ffU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Zu7AcypW6CLGe0zwAlboh6HUGUZThOjgK59in9vLP8nh81N7qojAmrmNm72kQAIVcnD2UN+6TcBVTNmYEHL54qylNEKqmkhbr+FREBUdYRsIqsQFjKD+/CuhEz0HrfFseRg8rLz2pmSqZXFzsxCKc3NqppAFUL13JV0ZwmENbUM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VesrkjJv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VesrkjJv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32E06C116B1; Fri, 31 May 2024 18:15:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717179323; bh=Wqf/4nMRINsqR/TmXLZx/sDAoqGQhcSMG3F2Th/6ffU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VesrkjJv6up1diwqXuGtbYujr0cqQ07UxSj8iPxgUp6nKGcVSyQK1x6q6bOr6hp8K ASQoIP6fkAzBXFwkHysbiQe7YgMm0sZMlxy5cCUkqpwA5SJ25KPlWRJ1fwUZ4rSImJ dDGS6oMkPXA/1b07Ibpjq/JsvHk+52Ofthn9Fvfr9pBz03QLZhQ61W6FTlXbse8Uxh rxMhGCVTBM15edO3d13YwDZOeREOnHXlvRIasrcv3reJuUL1z59kVH4Y6u1UGDJs+/ mWDGWiUPp3PC+D0C2bPpUbyjEEWAVUD0VJDTdgT+HB+xFf0kkugMEMMCvsS7LxUAA9 qzqTK9rXXwbhA== Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 19:15:17 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Michal Swiatkowski Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, michal.kubiak@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, wojciech.drewek@intel.com, pio.raczynski@gmail.com, jiri@nvidia.com, mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com, shayd@nvidia.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [iwl-next v3 04/15] ice: treat subfunction VSI the same as PF VSI Message-ID: <20240531181517.GH491852@kernel.org> References: <20240528043813.1342483-1-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com> <20240528043813.1342483-5-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240528043813.1342483-5-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 06:38:02AM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote: > When subfunction VSI is open the same code as for PF VSI should be > executed. Also when up is complete. Reflect that in code by adding > subfunction VSI to consideration. > > In case of stopping, PF doesn't have additional tasks, so the same > is with subfunction VSI. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski Reviewed-by: Simon Horman