From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in inet_dump_ifaddr()
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 06:54:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603065425.6b74c2dd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240602152102.1a50feed@kernel.org>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:21:02 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Netlink is full of legacy behavior, the only way to make it usable
> in modern environments is to let new families not repeat the mistakes.
> That's why I'd really rather not add a workaround at the af_netlink
> level. Why would ethtool (which correctly coalesced NLM_DONE from day 1)
> suddenly start needed another recv(). A lot of the time the entire dump
> fits in one skb.
>
> If you prefer to sacrifice all of rtnetlink (some of which, to be clear,
> has also been correctly coded from day 1) - we can add a trampoline for
> rtnetlink dump handlers?
Hi Eric, how do you feel about this approach? It would also let us
extract the "RTNL unlocked dump" handling from af_netlink.c, which
would be nice.
BTW it will probably need to be paired with fixing the
for_each_netdev_dump() foot gun, maybe (untested):
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3025,7 +3025,8 @@ int call_netdevice_notifiers_info(unsigned long val,
#define net_device_entry(lh) list_entry(lh, struct net_device, dev_list)
#define for_each_netdev_dump(net, d, ifindex) \
- xa_for_each_start(&(net)->dev_by_index, (ifindex), (d), (ifindex))
+ for (; (d = xa_find(&(net)->dev_by_index, &ifindex, \
+ ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT)); ifindex++)
static inline struct net_device *next_net_device(struct net_device *dev)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-01 21:25 [PATCH net] inet: bring NLM_DONE out to a separate recv() in inet_dump_ifaddr() Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-01 23:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-01 23:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-02 2:23 ` David Ahern
2024-06-02 10:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-02 22:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-03 13:54 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-06-03 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-03 14:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-03 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-02 21:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-03 2:42 ` David Ahern
2024-06-03 14:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2024-06-03 15:33 ` David Ahern
2024-06-03 15:34 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603065425.6b74c2dd@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).