From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net 12/15] af_unix: Use unix_recvq_full_lockless() in unix_stream_connect().
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:32:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603143231.62085-13-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603143231.62085-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Once sk->sk_state is changed to TCP_LISTEN, it never changes.
unix_accept() takes advantage of this characteristics; it does not
hold the listener's unix_state_lock() and only acquires recvq lock
to pop one skb.
It means unix_state_lock() does not prevent the queue length from
changing in unix_stream_connect().
Thus, we need to use unix_recvq_full_lockless() to avoid data-race.
Now we remove unix_recvq_full() as no one uses it.
Note that we can remove READ_ONCE() for sk->sk_max_ack_backlog in
unix_recvq_full_lockless() because of the following reasons:
(1) For SOCK_DGRAM, it is a written-once field in unix_create1()
(2) For SOCK_STREAM and SOCK_SEQPACKET, it is changed under the
listener's unix_state_lock() in unix_listen(), and we hold
the lock in unix_stream_connect()
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 6773f1465e50..88cda8af30d4 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -221,15 +221,9 @@ static inline int unix_may_send(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
return unix_peer(osk) == NULL || unix_our_peer(sk, osk);
}
-static inline int unix_recvq_full(const struct sock *sk)
-{
- return skb_queue_len(&sk->sk_receive_queue) > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog;
-}
-
static inline int unix_recvq_full_lockless(const struct sock *sk)
{
- return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) >
- READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
+ return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog;
}
struct sock *unix_peer_get(struct sock *s)
@@ -1545,7 +1539,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
if (other->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
goto out_unlock;
- if (unix_recvq_full(other)) {
+ if (unix_recvq_full_lockless(other)) {
err = -EAGAIN;
if (!timeo)
goto out_unlock;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 14:32 [PATCH v1 net 00/15] af_unix: Fix lockless access of sk->sk_state and others fields Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 01/15] af_unix: Set sk->sk_state under unix_state_lock() for truly disconencted peer Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 16:26 ` Cong Wang
2024-06-03 16:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 02/15] af_unix: Annodate data-races around sk->sk_state for writers Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 03/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_state in unix_inq_len() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 04/15] af_unix: Annotate data-races around sk->sk_state in unix_write_space() and poll() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 05/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_state in unix_stream_connect() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 06/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_state in unix_accept() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 07/15] af_unix: Annotate data-races around sk->sk_state in sendmsg() and recvmsg() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 08/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_state in unix_stream_read_skb() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 09/15] af_unix: Annotate data-races around sk->sk_state in UNIX_DIAG Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 10/15] af_unix: Annotate data-races around sk->sk_sndbuf Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 11/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of net->unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 13/15] af_unix: Use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in unix_release_sock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 14/15] af_unix: Use skb_queue_len_lockless() in sk_diag_show_rqlen() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v1 net 15/15] af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_shutdown in sk_diag_fill() Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603143231.62085-13-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).