From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374216FD5 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717510123; cv=none; b=DgdkJAUzz4LFJ9472zpeBt/soJuiZBtfXFVBrizqt/B/Oic8NdmMn6SUpQ6uc5Fmv2CwnNxvMHtAboHlBxgWc0beM7wY3Qjge31eP4jVx4YT1j2ss11JJkTTPKCjlbQ06Ac8d1f5tsW5UkBOAHZgptY2w44m6JYM1UwSRDYGc5Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717510123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T1Ev1/d2rEvhfr3l0LA8s22vj2Zl3EFQTCMj4skJvYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HfUFbFBzFFu93JIj4FU8LGUioMHT7eo5zP0b+uN1IEIXqudUMyodtgVKNa2Y60F5P6mvGgXUCo5iDyPZodx4iWEnJgrsN6zCU3sW9hilrHBj++2Wndc0sULTliuu1djKtFx7K05fURxp9gDZoFOZRkIdd9D3O3y1WrlFe4Xddxo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Oa9mgycG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Oa9mgycG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76440C32786; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:08:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717510122; bh=T1Ev1/d2rEvhfr3l0LA8s22vj2Zl3EFQTCMj4skJvYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Oa9mgycGGVSYlMsZmJ/8hFAfR3G0zDAWZnZ7vSt9D7+Hkg0HXRy/LsVBXkGaF3TBU twyA8krhVhMThE4/2tO96hsZ+iFMKhlntLazYbIkpUoWA+uzn7YeCHXJLuupglvlm/ c0OBhUpEJZN/t3CUcg8XzgNzmEuKLqsF+u9j1TPMZE7rQuFLbnZpjzjXfIgbrnI5z8 h6e+3obntEaNK3PVqu3A4Chcbr1SXWUvsuK1Lc5PIT1aYUJn+D+dfPL72DSofKc3yv 49vLCLnYVlYa3OAt+t/q2+mJpdXipRRxCYY3/iUpeZk9ASk1qR0YnXebO8A8V1Z0yG mEn9+eLrh/dBw== Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:08:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Ahern Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, Jaroslav Pulchart Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] rtnetlink: make the "split" NLM_DONE handling generic Message-ID: <20240604070841.438eba41@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <6861ace8-febe-43b8-b75a-751af0506c4d@kernel.org> References: <20240603184826.1087245-1-kuba@kernel.org> <6861ace8-febe-43b8-b75a-751af0506c4d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:33:50 -0600 David Ahern wrote: > You are using the legacy way for route, link and address dumps with the > option to quickly add the others as needed (meaning when a regression is > reported). If those 3 need the workaround, I think there are high odds > all of the other rtnl_register users will need it. So, if there is not > going to be a per-app opt-in to a new way, you might as well make this > the default for all rtnl families - sadly. I prefer the default (for new code) to be "modern".