From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B7FDDC1; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717642368; cv=none; b=bB/RpKrGVRWHXjGd6VBOTN7PMuW150KwJO77QXoB7WuqxnSIj48oXDYJ9aTRP3slPSoqv91eduPJcCVbmaU3tqGQ7QMRNwuOeuxhzjQ5EWB8oN96a5FTdzlxFNr+8swMStWDuFNiGIjPvtancGGqh4LvXk1xY9qYc6x4zLUUovw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717642368; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HROVuipAKXuirdCyCnGpSTm7nudy3FFtNvmjhbFZb84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fxU03jpMn6VLpSKtvtOk+FMcU5m6gk29nu8qlfj+OSFL2CLtKNvum7tV114Kj+zLCIod1bQqAB7d5+BqwDNgL26aYPeE57DDKLX1N2WbZZ/96I3PMdVapEAocKdKooYgxM8lk7FhXLfvsIDdRxsm3G6J0prWznJUgwb2u/jRouE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Vac1L6mH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Vac1L6mH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84D99C2BD11; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:52:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717642368; bh=HROVuipAKXuirdCyCnGpSTm7nudy3FFtNvmjhbFZb84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vac1L6mHNajcUDEa8MTI+QLkYCBc02hfZ/l30WauogorrWRzkzvZtdNm/EgpagvhU U57cDpbDCkzFcpGTa82isAWVrGLHYi8OvJEkjBmJWll7w8RFaZZy4z7U4tfjCN7G5x dIzgH1MPCXm2OlHsiRVq8SiIW4YxsKoLyC3o0T2zxtj+n6qXIm5XSziAFxh76yXqy4 fWctYme/OwBRspEpjHuPxwo9ex82po403pyAVeWimoEQAOMRSCvyWYGctG77zygiJM 3EtiNS2axwiX6IIZ+KXqjVvRu0U6ranm7J0V2cmrfd0wdyIgCt8mwrbPw9aInSuyzC uVW1HL/rWVtlQ== Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 19:52:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Boqun Feng , Daniel Borkmann , Eric Dumazet , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Waiman Long , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking. Message-ID: <20240605195246.6873138c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240604154425.878636-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20240604154425.878636-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:24:07 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Disabling bottoms halves acts as per-CPU BKL. On PREEMPT_RT code within > local_bh_disable() section remains preemtible. As a result high prior > tasks (or threaded interrupts) will be blocked by lower-prio task (or > threaded interrupts) which are long running which includes softirq > sections. Appears to not apply cleanly, please rebase