netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:58:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606145851.229116-1-vadfed@meta.com> (raw)

Add special flag to validate that TC BPF program properly updates
checksum information in skb.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
 - use network header offset as starting point for checksum
 - use folded checksum values to compare results
v2 -> v3:
 - remove BIT() macro from uapi bpf.h
 - change error code to EBADMSG
v1 -> v2:
 - clean unused variable
---
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  2 ++
 net/bpf/test_run.c             | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 25ea393cf084..35bcf52dbc65 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1425,6 +1425,8 @@ enum {
 #define BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU	(1U << 0)
 /* If set, XDP frames will be transmitted after processing */
 #define BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES	(1U << 1)
+/* If set, apply CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to skb and validate the checksum */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE	(1U << 2)
 
 /* type for BPF_ENABLE_STATS */
 enum bpf_stats_type {
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index f6aad4ed2ab2..c87df2c4cd57 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -977,7 +977,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	void *data;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
+	if ((kattr->test.flags & ~BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) ||
+	    kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
@@ -1025,6 +1026,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 
 	skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
 	__skb_put(skb, size);
+
 	if (ctx && ctx->ifindex > 1) {
 		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ctx->ifindex);
 		if (!dev) {
@@ -1060,9 +1062,19 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		__skb_push(skb, hh_len);
 	if (is_direct_pkt_access)
 		bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
+
 	ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
+
+	if (kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+		const int off = skb_network_offset(skb);
+		int len = skb->len - off;
+
+		skb->csum = skb_checksum(skb, off, len, 0);
+		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
+	}
+
 	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
@@ -1077,6 +1089,20 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		}
 		memset(__skb_push(skb, hh_len), 0, hh_len);
 	}
+
+	if (kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+		const int off = skb_network_offset(skb);
+		int len = skb->len - off;
+		__wsum csum;
+
+		csum = skb_checksum(skb, off, len, 0);
+
+		if (csum_fold(skb->csum) != csum_fold(csum)) {
+			ret = -EBADMSG;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
 	convert_skb_to___skb(skb, ctx);
 
 	size = skb->len;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 25ea393cf084..35bcf52dbc65 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1425,6 +1425,8 @@ enum {
 #define BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU	(1U << 0)
 /* If set, XDP frames will be transmitted after processing */
 #define BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES	(1U << 1)
+/* If set, apply CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to skb and validate the checksum */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE	(1U << 2)
 
 /* type for BPF_ENABLE_STATS */
 enum bpf_stats_type {
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06 14:58 Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2024-06-06 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option Vadim Fedorenko
2024-06-12 14:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-13 11:18   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-06-13 12:32     ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-06-13 12:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240606145851.229116-1-vadfed@meta.com \
    --to=vadfed@meta.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).