From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:58:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606145851.229116-1-vadfed@meta.com> (raw)
Add special flag to validate that TC BPF program properly updates
checksum information in skb.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
- use network header offset as starting point for checksum
- use folded checksum values to compare results
v2 -> v3:
- remove BIT() macro from uapi bpf.h
- change error code to EBADMSG
v1 -> v2:
- clean unused variable
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
net/bpf/test_run.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 25ea393cf084..35bcf52dbc65 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1425,6 +1425,8 @@ enum {
#define BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU (1U << 0)
/* If set, XDP frames will be transmitted after processing */
#define BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES (1U << 1)
+/* If set, apply CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to skb and validate the checksum */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE (1U << 2)
/* type for BPF_ENABLE_STATS */
enum bpf_stats_type {
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index f6aad4ed2ab2..c87df2c4cd57 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -977,7 +977,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
void *data;
int ret;
- if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
+ if ((kattr->test.flags & ~BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) ||
+ kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
return -EINVAL;
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
@@ -1025,6 +1026,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
__skb_put(skb, size);
+
if (ctx && ctx->ifindex > 1) {
dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ctx->ifindex);
if (!dev) {
@@ -1060,9 +1062,19 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
__skb_push(skb, hh_len);
if (is_direct_pkt_access)
bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
+
ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
+
+ if (kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+ const int off = skb_network_offset(skb);
+ int len = skb->len - off;
+
+ skb->csum = skb_checksum(skb, off, len, 0);
+ skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
+ }
+
ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
if (ret)
goto out;
@@ -1077,6 +1089,20 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
}
memset(__skb_push(skb, hh_len), 0, hh_len);
}
+
+ if (kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+ const int off = skb_network_offset(skb);
+ int len = skb->len - off;
+ __wsum csum;
+
+ csum = skb_checksum(skb, off, len, 0);
+
+ if (csum_fold(skb->csum) != csum_fold(csum)) {
+ ret = -EBADMSG;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
convert_skb_to___skb(skb, ctx);
size = skb->len;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 25ea393cf084..35bcf52dbc65 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1425,6 +1425,8 @@ enum {
#define BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU (1U << 0)
/* If set, XDP frames will be transmitted after processing */
#define BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES (1U << 1)
+/* If set, apply CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to skb and validate the checksum */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE (1U << 2)
/* type for BPF_ENABLE_STATS */
enum bpf_stats_type {
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 14:58 Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2024-06-06 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option Vadim Fedorenko
2024-06-12 14:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-13 11:18 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-06-13 12:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-06-13 12:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240606145851.229116-1-vadfed@meta.com \
--to=vadfed@meta.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).